Abstract
AbstractNot much is known about how accurate and reproducible different thermometers are at diagnosing patients with suspected fever. The study aims at evaluating which peripheral thermometers are more accurate and reproducible. We searched Medline, Embase, Scopus, WOS, CENTRAL, and Cinahl to perform: (1) diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis (MA) using rectal mercury-in-glass or digital thermometry as reference, and bivariate models for pooling; (2) network MA to estimate differences in mean temperature between devices; (3) Bland–Altman method to estimate 95% coefficient of reproducibility. PROSPERO registration: CRD42020174996. We included 46 studies enrolling more than 12,000 patients. Using 38 °C (100.4 ℉) as cut-off temperature, temporal infrared thermometry had a sensitivity of 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.65, 0.84; low certainty) and specificity of 0.96 (0.92, 0.98; moderate certainty); tympanic infrared thermometry had a sensitivity of 0.77 (0.60, 0.88; low certainty) and specificity of 0.98 (0.95, 0.99; moderate certainty). For all the other index devices, it was not possible to pool the estimates. Compared to the rectal mercury-in-glass thermometer, mean temperature differences were not statistically different from zero for temporal or tympanic infrared thermometry; the median coefficient of reproducibility ranged between 0.53 °C [0.95 ℉] for infrared temporal and 1.2 °C [2.16 ℉] for axillary digital thermometry. Several peripheral thermometers proved specific, but not sensitive for diagnosing fever with rectal thermometry as a reference standard, meaning that finding a temperature below 38 °C does not rule out fever. Fixed differences between temperatures together with random error means facing differences between measurements in the order of 2 °C [4.5 ℉]. This study informs practitioners of the limitations associated with different thermometers; peripheral ones are specific but not sensitive.
Funder
Fondazione Cassa si Risparmio di Firenze
Università di Pisa
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Emergency Medicine,Internal Medicine
Reference70 articles.
1. Kluger MJ (2015) Fever. Its biology, evolution, and function. Princeton University Press
2. Niven DJ, Gaudet JE, Laupland KB, Mrklas KJ, Roberts DJ, Stelfox HT (2015) Accuracy of peripheral thermometers for estimating temperature: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 163(10):768–777
3. Symptoms of coronavirus. Centers of disease control and prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/symptoms-testing/symptoms.html
4. (2020) Enforcement policy for clinical electronic thermometers during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19) Public health emergency. Guidance for industry and food and drug administration staff. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/enforcement-policy-clinical-electronic-thermometers-during-coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19-public
5. (2013) National Institute for Care and Health Excellence. Feverish illness in children: Assessment and initial management in children younger than 5 years. NICE Guidelines (CG160). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG160
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献