Publisher
Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Reference57 articles.
1. Arkin, R.C. (2007). Governing Lethal Behavior: Embedding an Ethical Controller in a Hybrid Deliberative-Reactive Robot Architecture. Atlanta: GVU Technical Report GIT-GVU-07-11, College of Computing, Georgia Tech. https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/37456443/Le_arkin.pdf. Accessed: 09.12.2017.
2. Arkin, R.C. (2008). Governing Lethal Behavior: Embedding Ethics in a Hybrid Deliberative-reactive Robot Architecture –Part III: Representational and Architectural Considerations. In Technology in Wartime Conference, 2008. Stanford Law School, http://hdl.handle.net/1853/22715. Accessed: 09.12.2017.
3. Bartneck, C., Kulic, D., Croft, E., & Zoghbi, S. (2009). Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(1), pp. 83–93.
4. Beck, S. (2016). The Problem of Ascribing Legal Responsibility in the Case of Robotics. AI & Society, 31(4), pp. 473–481.
5. Beer, J.M., Fisk, A.D., & Rogers, W.A. (2014). Toward a Framework for Levels of Robot Autonomy in Human-Robot Interaction. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 3(2), pp. 74–99.