Analyzing Distributed Action in the Making by Comparing Human-Robot Co-Work Scenarios-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Analyzing Distributed Action in the Making by Comparing Human-Robot Co-Work Scenarios

Published:2024 Issue: Volume: Page:205-230
ISSN:
Container-title:Digitalisierung der Arbeitswelten
language:de
Short-container-title:

Author:

Schulz-Schaeffer Ingo,Clausnitzer Tim,Wiggert Kevin,Meister Martin

Abstract

AbstractThis article presents a methodological approach to analyzing distributed action in the making and applies it to projects of developing human-robot co-work processes. We employ this methodical approach to point out different ways of making robotic labor available for work tasks previously inaccessible to robots. The empirical research was conducted as part of the research project “The social construction of human-robot co-work by means of prototype work settings (SoCoRob)” within the DFG Priority Program 2267 “The digitalization of working worlds. Conceptualizing and capturing a systemic transformation.”

Publisher

Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-658-44458-7_9

Reference34 articles.

1. Abelson, Robert P. 1981. Psychological Status of the Script Concept. American Psychologist 36 (7): 715-729.

2. Akrich, Madeleine. 1992a. Beyond Social Construction of Technology: The Shaping of People and Things in the Innovation Process. In New Technology at the Outset. Social Forces in the Shaping of Technological Innovations, edited by Meinolf Dierkes and Ute Hoffmann, 173–190. Frankfurt/Main: Campus.

3. Akrich, Madeleine. 1992b. The De-Scription of Technical Objects. In Shaping Technology; Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law, 205–224. Cambridge, Mass. u. a.: The MIT Press.

4. Akrich, Madeleine, and Bruno Latour. 1992. A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies. In Shaping Technology; Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law, 259–264. Cambridge, Mass. u. a.: The MIT Press.

5. Böhle, Fritz, and Brigitte Milkau. 1989. Neue Technologien – Neue Risiken. Neue Anforderungen an die Analyse von Arbeit. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 18 (4): 249–262.