Mixed-Method Approaches to Capture Digitalisation. The Case of Networked Digital Technology Permeation in German Hospitals

Author:

Melchior Alice,Schongen Sebastian,Pollak Reinhard

Abstract

AbstractGiven the interest and salience of the topic of digitalisation, it is not surprising that there is a large variety of multifaceted research and a multitude of different findings in sociology alone. However, the current debate is often criticised for its fuzziness and fragmentation. The lack of a unified conceptualisation of this fuzzy term and an overwhelming range of existing research tools makes it difficult to adequately capture digitalisation empirically, let alone study its direct consequences. In this article we introduce a template for a mixed-methods approach that allows us to circumvent these issues and enables researchers to study digitalisation and its effects comprehensively. We also apply our template and discuss the benefits for our empirical findings. Following the ideas of this volume, we focus on permeation as the concept we study with our approach and present the healthcare sector in Germany as an empirical example. For our mixed-methods approach we utilise a wide range of research tools using, for example, interviews with experts in various institutions, secondary data analysis and an online survey conducted in multiple hospitals. Our sometimes contradictory findings highlight that only by combining all these methods we do achieve a correct understanding of what permeation means for this sector.

Publisher

Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Reference64 articles.

1. Arntz, Melanie, Katharina Dengler, Ralf Dorau, Terry Gregory, Matthias Hartwig, Robert Helmrich, Florian Lehmer, et al. 2020. Digitalisierung und Wandel der Beschäftigung (DiWaBe) – Eine Datengrundlage für die interdisziplinäre Sozialpolitikforschung. 20–02. ZEW-Dokumentation. Mannheim.

2. Baethge, Martin, Heike Solga, and Markus Wieck. 2007. Berufsbildung im Umbruch. Signale eines überfälligen Aufbruchs. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung 60: 37–58.

3. Baethge-Kinsky, Volker, Martin Kuhlmann, and Knut Tullius. 2018. Technik und Arbeit in der Arbeitssoziologie – Konzepte für die Analyse des Zusammenhangs von Digitalisierung und Arbeit (version 1.0.0). AIS-Studien. SSOAR – GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.21241/SSOAR.64866.

4. Behnke, Joachim, Thomas Gschwend, Delia Schindler, and Kai-Uwe Schnapp. 2006. Methoden der Politikwissenschaft. Neuere qualitative und quantitative Analyseverfahren. Baden-Baden. Springer.

5. Benitez, Jose, Alvaro Arenas, Ana Castillo, and Jose Esteves. 2022. Impact of digital leadership capability on innovation performance: The role of platform digitization capability. Information & Management 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2022.103590.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3