Author:
Reifegerste Doreen,Wiedicke Annemarie
Abstract
AbstractThis chapter provides an overview about common methodological designs and constructs employed to examine the contents of health coverage and points out current research desiderata.
Funder
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Publisher
Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Reference83 articles.
1. Anhäuser, M., & Wormer, H. (2012). A question of quality: Criteria for the evaluation of science and medical reporting and testing their applicability. PCST 2012 Book of Papers: Quality, Honesty and Beauty in Science and Technology Communication. Retrieved from http://www.medien-doktor.de/medizin/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/downloads/2014/04/Paper-Florenz.pdf.
2. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265–299.
3. Borah, P. (2011). Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade’s literature. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 246–263.
4. Brechman, J. M., Lee, C.‑J., & Cappella, J. N. (2009). Lost in translation? A comparison of cancer-genetics reporting in the press release and its subsequent coverage in lay press. Science Communication, 30(4), 453–474.
5. Brechman, J. M., Lee, C.‑J., & Cappella, J. (2011). Distorting genetic research about cancer: From bench science to press release to published news. Journal of Communication, 61(3), 496–513.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献