Abstract
AbstractScience communication can be understood as all forms of communication focusing on scientific knowledge and scientific work, both within and outside institutionalized science, including its production, content, use and effects. It encompasses internal and external communication, science journalism and public relations and is thus directed to and by scientists as well as non-scientists, using one-way and dialogue-oriented forms to communicate between science and the public sphere. The present article provides an overview of content analysis of the main communicators of science communication: scientists, universities and scientific institutions and non-scientific, alternative science communicators.
Funder
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Publisher
Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Reference101 articles.
1. Acatech – Deutsche Akademie der Technikwissenschaften, Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Leopoldina, Union der deutschen Akademien der Wissenschaften (2017). Social Media und digitale Wissenschaftskommunikation. Analyse und Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Chancen und Risiken in der Demokratie [Social Media and digital science communication. Analysis and recommendations for managing chances and risks in a democracy]. München.
2. Albæk, E. (2011). The interaction between experts and journalists in news journalism. Journalism, 12(3), 335–348.
3. Ashlin, A., & Ladle, R. J. (2006). Science communication. Environmental science adrift in the blogosphere. Science, 312(5771), 201.
4. Askanius, T., & Uldam, J. (2011). Online social media for radical politics: Climate change activism on YouTube. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 4(1/2), 69.
5. Bal, T. L., & Sharik, T. L. (2019). Web content analysis of university forestry and related natural resources landing webpages in the United States in relation to student and faculty diversity. Journal of Forestry, 117(4), 379–397.