Abstract
AbstractThis chapter analyses the terms of action and structures in the virtual space, comparing them with the rules of the real space. The initial separation between real space and cyberspace is artificial yet intentional, with the aim of illustrating space-related opportunities. A view of the new opportunities in connection with digitalised reals spaces, and in particular with virtual spaces, also includes the problem that obtaining digital contents can be realised in society only in an unequal manner. In this context, educational research has identified serious limitations which are identified as digital divides and will be looked at from different angles. Incorporating these findings, it will be examined to what extent digitalisation can withstand the previously highlighted restrictions of capital accumulation and in which areas of daily life it is possible to dissolve the existing spatial and social rules.
Publisher
Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Reference56 articles.
1. Biermann, Ralf (2009): Die Bedeutung des Habitus-Konzepts für die Erforschung soziokultureller Unterschiede im Bereich der Medienpädagogik. MedienPädagogik 17, 1–18.
2. Bohn, Angela; Buchta, Christian; Hornik, Kurt & Mair, Patrick (2014): Making Friends and Communicating on Facebook: Implications for the Access to Social Capital. Social Networks 37, 29–41.
3. Bourdieu, Pierre (1979): Entwurf einer Theorie der Praxis auf der ethnologischen Grundlage der Kabylischen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
4. Bourdieu, Pierre (1983): Ökonomisches Kapital, kulturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital. In: Reinhard Kreckel (Hrsg.): Soziale Ungleichheiten. Göttingen: Schwartz, S. 183–198.
5. Bourdieu, Pierre (1991): Physischer, sozialer und angeeigneter physischer Raum. In: Martin Wentz (Hrsg.): Stadt-Räume. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus Verlag, 25–34.