The Impact of Sorbent Amendments for Mercury Remediation on the Viability of Soil Microorganisms
-
Published:2024-06-20
Issue:7
Volume:235
Page:
-
ISSN:0049-6979
-
Container-title:Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Water Air Soil Pollut
Author:
Ogbudu Jeffrey, Egbo Timothy E., Johs Alexander, Sahu Rajnish, Abdelmageed Yazeed, Ayariga Joseph, Robertson Boakai K.ORCID
Abstract
AbstractMercury (Hg) remediation across contaminated environments in the United States is an ongoing project. As part of the Hg cleanup strategy at East Fork Poplar Creek (EFPC), located in Oak Ridge, TN, the deployment of sorbents is considered. However, the impact of sorbents on soil microorganisms is poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the effect of sorbents on soil microorganism viability and biofilm formation to assess soil health during sorbent application for Hg remediation. We specifically investigated the effect of two engineered sorbents, Organoclay PM-199 and Organoclay MRM (which are manufactured from clay minerals formulated for various remediation applications), on two gram-negative organisms (Serratia marcescens and Burkholderia thailandensis) isolated from the Hg-contaminated EFPC bank soil. Pure cultures of S. marcescens or B. thailandensis were amended with 5% (w/v) and 25% (w/v) PM-199 and MRM, respectively, for 9 days. The samples were harvested, and bacterial cell viability was determined using a BacLight staining kit. Results showed that the growth of sorbent-amended S. marcescens was inhibited in contrast to that of unamended control. Furthermore, biochemical assays were used to analyze bacterial biofilm formation and integral biofilm components. Our results suggest that biofilm formation by sorbent-amended S. marcescens was negatively affected. In contrast, B. thailandensis amended with low concentrations of MRM showed enhanced growth and notable differences in biofilm morphology. These results suggest that the use of organoclay PM-199 and MRM at higher concentrations in field studies may hinder the growth of specific soil microorganisms.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference47 articles.
1. Awad, A., Shaikh, S., Jalab, R., Gulied, M., Nasser, M., Benamor, A., & Adham, S. (2019). Adsorption of Organic Pollutants by Natural and Modified Clays: A Comprehensive Review. Separation and Purification Technology, 228, 115719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.115719 2. Brooks, S. C., & Southworth, G. R. (2011). History of mercury use and environmental contamination at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant. Environmental Pollution, 159(1), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.09.009 3. Brooks, S., Eller, V., Dickson, J., Earles, J., Lowe, K., Mehlhorn, T., Olsen, T., Derolph, C., Watson, D., Phillips, D., & Peterson, M. (2017). Mercury Content of Sediments in East Fork Poplar Creek: Current Assessment and Past Trends. Retrieved December 8, 2023, from https://www.osti.gov/scitech/ 4. Chen, X., Feng, X., Liu, J., Fryxell, G. E., & Gong, M. (1999). Mercury separation and immobilization using self-assembled monolayers on mesoporous supports (SAMMS). Separation Science and Technology, 34(6–7), 1121–1132. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496399908951084 5. Dickson, J. O., Mayes, M. A., Brooks, S. C., Mehlhorn, T. L., Lowe, K. A., Earles, J. K., Goñez-Rodriguez, L., Watson, D. B., & Peterson, M. J. (2019). Source relationships between streambank soils and streambed sediments in a mercury-contaminated stream. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 19(4), 2007–2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-2183-0
|
|