Safety and Efficacy of DT-DEC01 Therapy in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Patients: A 12 - Month Follow-Up Study After Systemic Intraosseous Administration
-
Published:2023-09-14
Issue:8
Volume:19
Page:2724-2740
-
ISSN:2629-3269
-
Container-title:Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Stem Cell Rev and Rep
Author:
Siemionow MariaORCID, Biegański Grzegorz, Niezgoda Adam, Wachowiak Jacek, Czarnota Jarosław, Siemionow Krzysztof, Ziemiecka Anna, Sikorska Maria H., Bożyk Katarzyna, Heydemann Ahlke
Abstract
AbstractDuchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) is a progressive and fatal muscle-wasting disease with no known cure. We previously reported the preliminary safety and efficacy up to six months after the administration of DT-DEC01, a novel Dystrophin Expressing Chimeric (DEC) cell therapy created by fusion of myoblasts of DMD patient and the normal donor. In this 12-month follow-up study, we report on the safety and functional outcomes of three DMD patients after the systemic intraosseous administration of DT-DEC01. The safety of DT-DEC01 was confirmed by the absence of Adverse Events (AE) and Severe Adverse Events (SAE) up to 21 months after intraosseous DT-DEC01 administration. The lack of presence of anti-HLA antibodies and Donors Specific Antibodies (DSA) further confirmed DT-DEC01 therapy safety. Functional assessments in ambulatory patients revealed improvements in 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and timed functions of North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA). Additionally, improvements in PUL2.0 test and grip strength correlated with increased Motor Unit Potentials (MUP) duration recorded by Electromyography (EMG) in both ambulatory and non-ambulatory patients. DT-DEC01 systemic effect was confirmed by improved cardiac and pulmonary parameters and daily activity recordings. This follow-up study confirmed the safety and preliminary efficacy of DT-DEC01 therapy in DMD-affected patients up to 12 months after intraosseous administration. DT-DEC01 introduces a novel concept of personalized myoblast-based cellular therapy that is irrespective of the mutation type, does not require immunosuppression or the use of viral vectors, and carries no risk of off target mutations. This establishes DT-DEC01 as a promising and universally effective treatment option for all DMD patients.
Graphical Abstract
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference82 articles.
1. Bushby, K., Finkel, R., Birnkrant, D. J., Case, L. E., Clemens, P. R., Cripe, L., … Constantin, C. (2010). Diagnosis and management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, part 1: diagnosis, and pharmacological and psychosocial management. The Lancet Neurology, 9(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70271-6 2. Porcher, R., Desguerre, I., Amthor, H., Chabrol, B., Audic, F., Rivier, F., … Wahbi, K. (2021). Association between prophylactic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and overall survival in Duchenne muscular dystrophy—analysis of registry data. European Heart Journal, 42(20), 1976–1984. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab054 3. Szabo, S. M., Salhany, R. M., Deighton, A., Harwood, M., Mah, J., & Gooch, K. L. (2021). The clinical course of Duchenne muscular dystrophy in the corticosteroid treatment era: A systematic literature review. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 16(1), 237. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01862-w 4. Van Ruiten, H. J. A., Marini Bettolo, C., Cheetham, T., Eagle, M., Lochmuller, H., Straub, V., … Guglieri, M. (2016). Why are some patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy dying young: An analysis of causes of death in North East England. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, 20(6), 904–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2016.07.020 5. Wahlgren, L., Kroksmark, A.-K., Tulinius, M., & Sofou, K. (2022). One in five patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy dies from other causes than cardiac or respiratory failure. European Journal of Epidemiology, 37(2), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-021-00819-4
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|