1. Stephens MB, Follin S, Petersson J, Isaksson H, Juhlin C, Simeonov A (2015) Review of the deterministic modelling of deformation zones and fracture domains at the site proposed for a spent nuclear fuel repository Sweden, and consequences of structural anisotropy. Tectonophysics 653:68–94 (and references therein)
2. Lewis B, Thompson W, Iglesias F (2012) in Comprehensive nuclear materials, ed. R. J. M. Konings, Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 515–546
3. OECD-NEA, (1999) Actinide and fission product partitioning and transmutation: status and assessment report OECD, Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), Paris
4. OECD-NEA, (2006) Advanced nuclear fuel cycles and radioactive waste management NEA No. 5990, OECD, Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), Paris
5. OECD-NEA, (2011) Potential benefits and impacts of advanced nuclear fuel cycles with actinide partitioning and transmutation NEA No. 6894, OECD, Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), Paris