Pain and Opioid Consumption After Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial (LOGICA-Trial)

Author:

van der Veen Arjen,Ramaekers Mark,Marsman Marije,Brenkman Hylke J. F.,Seesing Maarten F. J.,Luyer Misha D. P.,Nieuwenhuijzen Grard A. P.,Stoot Jan H. M. B.,Tegels Juul J. W.,Wijnhoven Bas P. L.,de Steur Wobbe O.,Kouwenhoven Ewout A.,Wassenaar Eelco B.,Draaisma Werner A.,Gisbertz Suzanne S.,van der Peet Donald L.,May Anne M.,Ruurda Jelle P.,van Hillegersberg Richard,Haverkamp Leonie,Ponten Jeroen E. H.,Heesakkers Fanny F. B. M.,Hulsewe Karel W. E.,Tweed Thais T. T.,Lagarde Sjoerd M.,van Lanschot Jan J. B.,Hartgrink Henk H.,van Det Marc J.,van Duijvendijk Peter,van der Zaag Edwin S.,Broeders Ivo A. M. J.,van Berge Henegouwen Mark I.,Daams Freek,

Abstract

Abstract Background Laparoscopic gastrectomy could reduce pain and opioid consumption, compared to open gastrectomy. However, it is difficult to judge the clinical relevance of this reduction, since these outcomes are reported in few randomized trials and in limited detail. Methods This secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial compared laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma (cT1-4aN0-3bM0). Postoperative pain was analyzed by opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents (OME, mg/day) at postoperative day (POD) 1–5, WHO analgesic steps, and Numeric Rating Scales (NRS, 0–10) at POD 1–10 and discharge. Regression and mixed model analyses were performed, with and without correction for epidural analgesia. Results Between 2015 and 2018, 115 patients in the laparoscopic group and 110 in the open group underwent surgery. Some 16 patients (14%) in the laparoscopic group and 73 patients (66%) in the open group received epidural analgesia. At POD 1–3, mean opioid consumption was 131, 118, and 53 mg OME lower in the laparoscopic group, compared to the open group, respectively (all p < 0.001). After correcting for epidural analgesia, these differences remained significant at POD 1–2 (47 mg OME, p = 0.002 and 69 mg OME, p < 0.001, respectively). At discharge, 27% of patients in the laparoscopic group and 43% patients in the open group used oral opioids (p = 0.006). Mean highest daily pain scores were between 2 and 4 at all PODs, < 2 at discharge, and did not relevantly differ between treatment arms. Conclusion In this multicenter randomized trial, postoperative pain was comparable between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy. After laparoscopic gastrectomy, this was generally achieved without epidural analgesia and with fewer opioids. Trial Registration NCT02248519.

Funder

ZonMw

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Gastroenterology,Surgery

Reference37 articles.

1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.

2. Al-Batran SE, Homann N, Pauligk C, Goetze TO, Meiler J, Kasper S, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4). The Lancet. 2019;6736(18):1–10.

3. Brenkman HJF, Ruurda JP, Verhoeven RHA, van Hillegersberg R. Safety and feasibility of minimally invasive gastrectomy during the early introduction in the Netherlands: short-term oncological outcomes comparable to open gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer. 2017;20(5):853–60.

4. Gertsen EC, Brenkman HJF, Haverkamp L, Read M, Ruurda JP, Van Hillegersberg R. Worldwide Practice in Gastric Cancer Surgery: A 6-Year Update. Dig Surg. 2021;

5. Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (DUCA) annual report 2019 [Internet]. [cited 2021 Aug 24]. Available from: https://dica.nl/jaarrapportage-2019/duca

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3