Biomechanical Analysis of the External Fixation in a Lumbar Fracture Model: A Finite Element Study
-
Published:2022-06-24
Issue:4
Volume:42
Page:469-478
-
ISSN:1609-0985
-
Container-title:Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J. Med. Biol. Eng.
Author:
Liao Yijia, Yan Yiguo, Kang Yu, Wang Wenjun, Song Xizheng, Peng Wen, Fu Haibin, Chen Huarong, Wang ChengORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical characteristics of the external spinal fixation for treating lumbar fracture through finite element analysis (FEA) and provide a theoretical basis for its further application.
Methods
Two different models of L3 fracture fixed with the external spinal fixation and the internal fixation system respectively were constructed. The ROM, maximum stresses at L3, and the screws of the two models were measured under load control. Subsequently, the applied torque, the maximum stressed at L3, L1/2, L2/3, L3/4, L4/5 discs and the screws were analyzed under displacement control.
Results
Under load control, the external fixation model reserved more ROM than the internal fixation model (40.4–48.0% vs 30.5–41.0%). Compared to the internal fixation model, the maximum stresses at L3 and screws in the external fixation model were increased. Under displacement control, the external fixation model required fewer moments (N·mm) than the internal fixation model (flexion: 7500 vs 12,294; extension: 7500 vs 9027). Further, the maximum stresses at L3 and the screws in the external fixation model were greater than those of the internal fixation model, while the maximum stresses at the upper and lower adjacent discs of fixed segments were less than the internal fixation model.
Conclusion
Compared to the internal fixation system, the external fixation has a better stress distribution with the greater overall mobility. It theoretically reduces the stress concentration of the adjacent discs and the stress shielding of the fractured vertebral body.
Funder
the Clinical Medical Technology Innovation Guidance Project of Hunan Province the Key Laboratory in Hengyang City the project of health commission in Hunan Province
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Biomedical Engineering,General Medicine
Reference31 articles.
1. Wang, H., Zhang, Y., Xiang, Q., Wang, X., Li, C., Xiong, H., & Zhou, Y. (2012). Epidemiology of traumatic spinal fractures: Experience from medical university-affiliated hospitals in Chongqing, China, 2001–2010. Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 17(5), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.8.SPINE111003 2. Holmes, J. F., Miller, P. Q., Panacek, E. A., Lin, S., Horne, N. S., & Mower, W. R. (2001). Epidemiology of thoracolumbar spine injury in blunt trauma. Academic emergency medicine, 8(9), 866–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01146.x 3. Xu, G. J., Li, Z. J., Ma, J. X., Zhang, T., Fu, X., & Ma, X. L. (2013). Anterior versus posterior approach for treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: A meta-analysis. European Spine Journal, 22(10), 2176–2183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2987-y 4. Zhu, Q., Shi, F., Cai, W., Bai, J., Fan, J., & Yang, H. (2015). Comparison of anterior versus posterior approach in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures: A systematic review. International Surgery, 100(6), 1124–1133. https://doi.org/10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00135.1 5. Aono, H., Ishii, K., Tobimatsu, H., Nagamoto, Y., Takenaka, S., Furuya, M., Chiaki, H., & Iwasaki, M. (2017). Temporary short-segment pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar burst fractures: Comparative study with or without vertebroplasty. The Spine Journal, 17(8), 1113–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.03.022
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|