Abstract
AbstractDifferent forms of fluctuations of the terrestrial gravity field are observed by gravity experiments. For example, atmospheric pressure fluctuations generate a gravity-noise foreground in measurements with super-conducting gravimeters. Gravity changes caused by high-magnitude earthquakes have been detected with the satellite gravity experiment GRACE, and we expect high-frequency terrestrial gravity fluctuations produced by ambient seismic fields to limit the sensitivity of ground-based gravitational-wave (GW) detectors. Accordingly, terrestrial gravity fluctuations are considered noise and signal depending on the experiment. Here, we will focus on ground-based gravimetry. This field is rapidly progressing through the development of GW detectors. The technology is pushed to its current limits in the advanced generation of the LIGO and Virgo detectors, targeting gravity strain sensitivities better than 10−23 Hz−1/2 above a few tens of a Hz. Alternative designs for GW detectors evolving from traditional gravity gradiometers such as torsion bars, atom interferometers, and superconducting gradiometers are currently being developed to extend the detection band to frequencies below 1 Hz. The goal of this article is to provide the analytical framework to describe terrestrial gravity perturbations in these experiments. Models of terrestrial gravity perturbations related to seismic fields, atmospheric disturbances, and vibrating, rotating or moving objects, are derived and analyzed. The models are then used to evaluate passive and active gravity noise mitigation strategies in GW detectors, or alternatively, to describe their potential use in geophysics. The article reviews the current state of the field, and also presents new analyses especially with respect to the impact of seismic scattering on gravity perturbations, active gravity noise cancellation, and time-domain models of gravity perturbations from atmospheric and seismic point sources. Our understanding of terrestrial gravity fluctuations will have great impact on the future development of GW detectors and high-precision gravimetry in general, and many open questions need to be answered still as emphasized in this article.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
Reference181 articles.
1. Aasi, J. et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), “Advanced LIGO”, Class. Quantum Grav., 32, 074001 (2015). [DOI]. (Cited on pages 8 and 27.)
2. Abbott, R. et al., “Seismic isolation enhancements for initial and Advanced LIGO”, Class. Quantum Grav., 21, S915 (2004). [DOI], [ADS]. (Cited on page 22.)
3. Abernathy, M. et al. (ET Science Team), Einstein gravitational wave Telescope conceptual design study, ET-0106C-10, (EGO, Cascina, 2011). URL (accessed 27 October 2015): https://tds.ego-gw.it/ql/?c=7954. (Cited on page 117.)
4. Abramovici, A. and Chapsky, J., Feedback Control Systems: A Fast-Track Guide for Scientists and Engineers, (Kluwer Academic, Boston, 2000). [DOI]. (Cited on page 22.)
5. Abubakar, I., “Scattering of plane elastic waves at rough surfaces. I”, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 58, 136–157 (1962). [DOI]. (Cited on page 119.)
Cited by
70 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献