Contextual Integrity as a General Conceptual Tool for Evaluating Technological Change

Author:

O’Neill ElizabethORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe fast pace of technological change necessitates new evaluative and deliberative tools. This article develops a general, functional approach to evaluating technological change, inspired by Nissenbaum’s theory of contextual integrity. Nissenbaum (2009) introduced the concept of contextual integrity to help analyze how technological changes can produce privacy problems. Reinterpreted, the concept of contextual integrity can aid our thinking about how technological changes affect the full range of human concerns and values—not only privacy. I propose a generalized concept of contextual integrity that is applicable to a broader variety of circumstances, and I outline a new, general procedure for technological evaluation. Among the attractive features of the proposed approach to evaluating technological change are its context-sensitivity, adaptability, and principled presumptive conservatism, enabled by the mechanism the approach supplies for reevaluating existing practices, norms, and values.

Funder

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy

Reference71 articles.

1. Anderson, E. (2015). Moral bias and corrective practices: A pragmatist perspective. Proceedings and Addresses of the APA, 89, 21–47.

2. Ault, W. O. (1961). By-laws of gleaning and the problems of harvest. The Economic History Review, 14(2), 210–217.

3. Baker, R. (2013). Before bioethics: A history of American medical ethics from the colonial period to the bioethics revolution. Oxford University Press.

4. Baker, R. (2019). The structure of moral revolutions. MIT Press.

5. Benthall, S., & Haynes, B. (2019, August 19). Contexts are political: Field theory and privacy. Symposium on Applications of Contextual Integrity, Berkeley, CA.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3