Abstract
AbstractNovel technological devices, applications, and algorithms can provide us with a vast amount of personal information about ourselves. Given that we have ethical and practical reasons to pursue self-knowledge, should we use technology to increase our self-knowledge? And which ethical issues arise from the pursuit of technologically sourced self-knowledge? In this paper, I explore these questions in relation to bioinformation technologies (health and activity trackers, DTC genetic testing, and DTC neurotechnologies) and algorithmic profiling used for recommender systems, targeted advertising, and technologically supported decision-making. First, I distinguish between impersonal, critical, and relational self-knowledge. Relational self-knowledge is a so far neglected dimension of self-knowledge which is introduced in this paper. Next, I investigate the contribution of these technologies to the three types of self-knowledge and uncover the connected ethical concerns. Technology can provide a lot of impersonal self-knowledge, but we should focus on the quality of the information which tends to be particularly insufficient for marginalized groups. In terms of critical self-knowledge, the nature of technologically sourced personal information typically impedes critical engagement. The value of relational self-knowledge speaks in favour of transparency of information technology, notably for algorithms that are involved in decision-making about individuals. Moreover, bioinformation technologies and digital profiling shape the concepts and norms that define us. We should ensure they not only serve commercial interests but our identity and self-knowledge interests.
Funder
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
University of Zurich
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference60 articles.
1. 23andMe. (2023). Ancestry Service. https://www.23andme.com/dna-ancestry/. Accessed 05. 04.
2. Agre, P. E. (1998). Introduction. In P. E. Agre, & M. Rotenberg (Eds.), Technology and privacy: The new landscape (pp. 1–28). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6682.001.0001
3. Alikhademi, K., Drobina, E., Prioleau, D., Richardson, B., Purves, D., & Gilbert, J. E. (2022). A review of predictive policing from the perspective of fairness. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 30(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-021-09286-4
4. Andreou, A., Venkatadri, G., Goga, O., Gummadi, K., Loiseau, P., & Mislove, A. (2018). Investigating Ad Transparency Mechanisms in Social Media: A Case Study of Facebook's Explanations. In NDSS 2018 - Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (p. 1–15), Feb 2018, San Diego, USA. https://doi.org/10.14722/ndss.2018.2320
5. Baylis, F. (2012). The Self in Situ: A Relational Account of Personal Identity. In J. Downie & J. J. Llewellyn (Eds.), Being Relational: Reflections on Relational Theory and Health Law (pp. 109–131). UBC Press.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献