Abstract
Abstract
One of the pressing issues in philosophy of technology is the role of human creativity in human-technology relations. We first observe that a techno-centric orientation of philosophy of technology leaves open the role and contribution of human creativity in technological evolution, while an anthropocentric orientation leaves open the role of the technical milieu in technological evolution. Subsequently, we develop a concept of creation as deviation and responsiveness in response to affordances in the environment, inspired by the affordance theory by James Gibson. With this concept of creation as deviative responsiveness, we articulate the human contribution to human-technology creation, namely, our intentional deviation of the inhibiting forces of the currently dominant niche or meaningful world of human-technology relations, in order to become responsive to new affordances in human-technology creation that constitute a new niche or world of human-technology relations.
Funder
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference40 articles.
1. Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago University Press.
2. Aristotle (1980) The physics. Trans. P.H. Wicksteed and F.M. Cornford. Cambridge/London: Loeb Classical Library/Harvard UP.
3. Aydin, C., González Woge, M., & Verbeek, P. P. (2019). Technological environmentality: Conceptualizing technology as a mediating milieu. Philosophy & Technology., 32, 321–338.
4. Bardin, A. (2018). Philosophy as political technē: The tradition of invention in Simondon’s political thought. Contemporary Political Theory, 17, 417–436.
5. Blok, V. (2014a). Reconnecting with nature in the age of technology: The Heidegger and radical environmentalism debate revisited. Environmental Philosophy, 11(2), 307–332.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献