A Virtue-Based Framework to Support Putting AI Ethics into Practice

Author:

Hagendorff ThiloORCID

Abstract

AbstractMany ethics initiatives have stipulated sets of principles and standards for good technology development in the AI sector. However, several AI ethics researchers have pointed out a lack of practical realization of these principles. Following that, AI ethics underwent a practical turn, but without deviating from the principled approach. This paper proposes a complementary to the principled approach that is based on virtue ethics. It defines four “basic AI virtues”, namely justice, honesty, responsibility and care, all of which represent specific motivational settings that constitute the very precondition for ethical decision making in the AI field. Moreover, it defines two “second-order AI virtues”, prudence and fortitude, that bolster achieving the basic virtues by helping with overcoming bounded ethicality or hidden psychological forces that can impair ethical decision making and that are hitherto disregarded in AI ethics. Lastly, the paper describes measures for successfully cultivating the mentioned virtues in organizations dealing with AI research and development.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy

Reference107 articles.

1. Abdalla, M., & Abdalla, M. (2020). The Grey Hoodie Project: Big Tobacco, Big Tech, and the threat on academic integrity. arXiv, 1–9.

2. Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy, 33(124), 1–19.

3. Aristotle, Barlett, R. C., & Collins, S. D. (2012). Aristotle’s Nicomachean ethics. University of Chicago Press.

4. Asch, S. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgment. In H. S. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men: Research in human relations (pp. 177–190). Pittsburgh: Russell & Russell.

5. Asch, SE. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70(9), 1–70.

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3