Conceptualizing Automated Decision-Making in Organizational Contexts

Author:

Boos Anna KatharinaORCID

Abstract

AbstractDespite growing interest in automated (or algorithmic) decision-making (ADM), little work has been done to conceptually clarify the term. This article aims to tackle this issue by developing a conceptualization of ADM specifically tailored to organizational contexts. It has two main goals: (1) to meaningfully demarcate ADM from similar, yet distinct algorithm-supported practices; and (2) to draw internal distinctions such that different ADM types can be meaningfully distinguished. The proposed conceptualization builds on three arguments: First, ADM primarily refers to the automation of practical decisions (decisions to φ) as opposed to cognitive decisions (decisions that p). Second, rather than referring to algorithms as literally making decisions, ADM refers to the use of algorithms to solve decision problems at an organizational level. Third, since algorithmic tools by nature primarily settle cognitive decision problems, their classification as ADM depends on whether and to what extent an algorithmically generated output p has an action triggering effect—i.e., translates into a consequential action φ. The examination of precisely this p-φ relationship, allows us to pinpoint different ADM types (suggesting, offloading, superseding). Taking these three arguments into account, we arrive at the following definition: ADM refers to the practice of using algorithms to solve decision problems, where these algorithms can play a suggesting, offloading, or superseding role relative to humans, and decisions are defined as action triggering choices.

Funder

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung

University of Zurich

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference105 articles.

1. Ågerfalk, P. J., Conboy, K., Crowston, K., Lundström, J. S. Z. E., Jarvenpaa, S., Mikalef, P., & Ram, S. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in information systems: State of the art and research roadmap. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.05017

2. Aldrich, H. (1979). Organizations and environments. Prentice-Hall.

3. AlgorithmWatch (2020). Automating society (Report 2020). AlgorithmWatch GmbH & Bertelsmann Stiftung. Retrieved February 05, 2023 from https://automatingsociety.algorithmwatch.org

4. AlgorithmWatch (2019). Automating society: Taking stock of automated decision-making in the EU (Report 2019). AlgorithmWatch GmbH & & Bertelsmann Stiftung. Retrieved February 05, 2023 from https://automatingsociety.algorithmwatch.org/

5. Alter, S. (1977). A taxonomy of decision support systems. Sloan Management Review, 19(1), 39–56.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3