Personal Autonomy and (Digital) Technology: An Enactive Sensorimotor Framework

Author:

Pérez-Verdugo MartaORCID,Barandiaran Xabier E.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractMany digital technologies, designed and controlled by intensive data-driven corporate platforms, have become ubiquitous for many of our daily activities. This has raised political and ethical concerns over how they might be threatening our personal autonomy. However, not much philosophical attention has been paid to the specific role that their hyper-designed (sensorimotor) interfaces play in this regard. In this paper, we aim to offer a novel framework that can ground personal autonomy on sensorimotor interaction and, from there, directly address how technological design affects personal autonomy. To do this, we will draw from enactive sensorimotor approaches to cognition, focusing on the central notion of habits, understood as sensorimotor schemes that, in networked relations, give rise to sensorimotor agency. Starting from sensorimotor agency as a basis for more complex forms of personal autonomy, our approach gives us grounds to analyse our relationship with technology (in general) and to distinguish between autonomy-enhancing and autonomy-diminishing technologies. We argue that, by favouring/obstructing the enactment of certain (networks of) habits over others, technologies can directly act upon our personal autonomy, locally and globally. With this in mind, we then discuss how current digital technologies are often being designed to be autonomy-diminishing (as is the case of “dark patterns” in design), and sketch some ideas on how to build more autonomy-enhancing digital technologies.

Funder

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación

Eusko Jaurlaritza

Diputación Foral de Gipuzkoa

Universidad del País Vasco

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy

Reference117 articles.

1. Aagaard, J. (2015). Drawn to distraction: A qualitative study of off-task use of educational technology. Computers & Education, 87, 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.010

2. Agudo, U., & Liberal, K. G. (2022). La Automatización Paternalista. Biko INSIGHTS, 5, 5–13. Retrieved June 1, 2023, from https://www.biko2.com/insights/BIKO-INSIGHTS-5-2022.pdf

3. Airoldi, M. (2021). Machine Habitus: Toward a sociology of algorithms. John Wiley & Sons.

4. Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M., & Song, L. (2022). Digital addiction (Working Paper No. 28936

5. NBER Working Papers). National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved March 21, 2023, from https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.2021086

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3