Abstract
AbstractIn this paper, I explore Derrida’s concept of exteriorization in relation to texts generated by machine learning. I first discuss Heidegger’s view of machine creation and then present Derrida’s criticism of Heidegger. I explain the concept of iterability, which is the central notion on which Derrida’s criticism is based. The thesis defended in the paper is that Derrida’s account of iterability provides a helpful framework for understanding the phenomenon of machine learning–generated literature. His account of textuality highlights the incalculability and mechanical elements characteristic of all texts, including machine-generated texts. By applying Derrida’s concept to the phenomenon of machine creation, we can deconstruct the distinction between human and non-human creation. As I propose in the conclusion to this paper, this provides a basis on which to consider potential positive uses of machine learning.
Funder
John Templeton Foundation
Slovak Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference55 articles.
1. Arkoudas, K. (2023). ChatGPT is no stochastic parrot. but it also claims that 1 is greater than 1. Philosophy and Technology, 6(3), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00619-6
2. Bajohr, H. (2023). Operative ekphrasis: The collapse of the text/image distinction in multimodal AI, under review.
3. Barthes, R. (1970). Writing degree zero. Beacon Press.
4. Barthes, R. (1977). Death of the author. In S. Heath (Ed.), Image, music, text (pp. 142–147). Fontana Press.
5. Bennington, G. (1996). Emergencies. Oxford Literary Review, 18(1), 175–216. https://doi.org/10.3366/olr.1996.009
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献