Abstract
AbstractSoftware systems play an ever more important role in our lives and software engineers and their companies find themselves in a position where they are held responsible for ethical issues that may arise. In this paper, we try to disentangle ethical considerations that can be performed at the level of the software engineer from those that belong in the wider domain of business ethics. The handling of ethical problems that fall into the responsibility of the engineer has traditionally been addressed by the publication of Codes of Ethics and Conduct. We argue that these Codes are barely able to provide normative orientation in software development. The main contribution of this paper is, thus, to analyze the normative features of Codes of Ethics in software engineering and to explicate how their value-based approach might prevent their usefulness from a normative perspective. Codes of Conduct cannot replace ethical deliberation because they do not and cannot offer guidance because of their underdetermined nature. This lack of orientation, we argue, triggers reactive behavior such as “cherry-picking,” “risk of indifference,” “ex-post orientation,” and the “desire to rely on gut feeling.” In the light of this, we propose to implement ethical deliberation within software development teams as a way out.
Funder
Bavarian Research Institute for Digital Transformation
Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference74 articles.
1. Beck, K., & Andres, C. (2004). Extreme programming explained: Embrace change. (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley Professional.
2. Boenink, M., Swierstra, T., & Stemerding, D. (2010). Anticipating the interaction between technology and morality: A scenario study of experimenting with humans in bionanotechnology. Studies in ethics, law, and technology, 4(2).
3. Brey, P. A. (2011). Anticipatory technology ethics for emerging IT. CEPE 2011: Crossing Boundaries, 13, 868.
4. Brey, P. A. (2012). Anticipatory ethics for emerging technologies. NanoEthics, 6(1), 1–13.
5. Corfield, G. (2018). Here is how Google handles Right To Be Forgotten requests. The Register. Link: https://www.theregister.com/2018/03/19/google_right_to_be_forgotten_request_process/#:~:text=RTBF%20trial%20Google%20allows%20software,its%20internal%20bug%2Dhandling%20systems.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献