Ethics in the Software Development Process: from Codes of Conduct to Ethical Deliberation

Author:

Gogoll JanORCID,Zuber Niina,Kacianka Severin,Greger Timo,Pretschner Alexander,Nida-Rümelin Julian

Abstract

AbstractSoftware systems play an ever more important role in our lives and software engineers and their companies find themselves in a position where they are held responsible for ethical issues that may arise. In this paper, we try to disentangle ethical considerations that can be performed at the level of the software engineer from those that belong in the wider domain of business ethics. The handling of ethical problems that fall into the responsibility of the engineer has traditionally been addressed by the publication of Codes of Ethics and Conduct. We argue that these Codes are barely able to provide normative orientation in software development. The main contribution of this paper is, thus, to analyze the normative features of Codes of Ethics in software engineering and to explicate how their value-based approach might prevent their usefulness from a normative perspective. Codes of Conduct cannot replace ethical deliberation because they do not and cannot offer guidance because of their underdetermined nature. This lack of orientation, we argue, triggers reactive behavior such as “cherry-picking,” “risk of indifference,” “ex-post orientation,” and the “desire to rely on gut feeling.” In the light of this, we propose to implement ethical deliberation within software development teams as a way out.

Funder

Bavarian Research Institute for Digital Transformation

Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy

Reference74 articles.

1. Beck, K., & Andres, C. (2004). Extreme programming explained: Embrace change. (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley Professional.

2. Boenink, M., Swierstra, T., & Stemerding, D. (2010). Anticipating the interaction between technology and morality: A scenario study of experimenting with humans in bionanotechnology. Studies in ethics, law, and technology, 4(2).

3. Brey, P. A. (2011). Anticipatory technology ethics for emerging IT. CEPE 2011: Crossing Boundaries, 13, 868.

4. Brey, P. A. (2012). Anticipatory ethics for emerging technologies. NanoEthics, 6(1), 1–13.

5. Corfield, G. (2018). Here is how Google handles Right To Be Forgotten requests. The Register. Link: https://www.theregister.com/2018/03/19/google_right_to_be_forgotten_request_process/#:~:text=RTBF%20trial%20Google%20allows%20software,its%20internal%20bug%2Dhandling%20systems.

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Integrating ethics in AI development: a qualitative study;BMC Medical Ethics;2024-01-23

2. Vox Populi, Vox ChatGPT: Large Language Models, Education and Democracy;Philosophies;2024-01-11

3. Value-Sensitive Software Design: Ethical Deliberation in Agile Development Processes;Introduction to Digital Humanism;2023-12-21

4. Global trends in disruptive technological change: social and policy implications for education;On the Horizon: The International Journal of Learning Futures;2023-09-05

5. Scaffolding Ethics-Focused Methods for Practice Resonance;Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference;2023-07-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3