Ethical Issues in Democratizing Digital Phenotypes and Machine Learning in the Next Generation of Digital Health Technologies
-
Published:2021-03-21
Issue:4
Volume:34
Page:1945-1960
-
ISSN:2210-5433
-
Container-title:Philosophy & Technology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Philos. Technol.
Author:
Mulvenna Maurice D.ORCID, Bond RaymondORCID, Delaney JackORCID, Dawoodbhoy Fatema MustansirORCID, Boger JenniferORCID, Potts CourtneyORCID, Turkington RobinORCID
Abstract
AbstractDigital phenotyping is the term given to the capturing and use of user log data from health and wellbeing technologies used in apps and cloud-based services. This paper explores ethical issues in making use of digital phenotype data in the arena of digital health interventions. Products and services based on digital wellbeing technologies typically include mobile device apps as well as browser-based apps to a lesser extent, and can include telephony-based services, text-based chatbots, and voice-activated chatbots. Many of these digital products and services are simultaneously available across many channels in order to maximize availability for users. Digital wellbeing technologies offer useful methods for real-time data capture of the interactions of users with the products and services. It is possible to design what data are recorded, how and where it may be stored, and, crucially, how it can be analyzed to reveal individual or collective usage patterns. The paper also examines digital phenotyping workflows, before enumerating the ethical concerns pertaining to different types of digital phenotype data, highlighting ethical considerations for collection, storage, and use of the data. A case study of a digital health app is used to illustrate the ethical issues. The case study explores the issues from a perspective of data prospecting and subsequent machine learning. The ethical use of machine learning and artificial intelligence on digital phenotype data and the broader issues in democratizing machine learning and artificial intelligence for digital phenotype data are then explored in detail.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference42 articles.
1. Apte, A., Ingole, V., Lele, P., Marsh, A., Bhattacharjee, T., Hirve, S., Campbell, H., Nair, H., Chan, S., & Juvekar, S. (2019). Ethical considerations in the use of GPS-based movement tracking in health research – Lessons from a care-seeking study in rural west India. Journal of Global Health [Online], 9(1). Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6596313/. Accessed 25 June 2019. 2. Archbold, P. G., Stewart, B. J., Greenlick, M. R., & Harvath, T. (1990). Mutuality and preparedness as predictors of caregiver role strain. Research in Nursing & Health, 13, 375–384. 3. Bond, R. B., Koene, A., Dix, A., Boger, J., Mulvenna, M. D., Galushka, M., Waterhouse-Bradley, B., Browne F., Wang, H., & Wong, A. (2019). Democratization of usable machine learning in computer vision. Workshop on Fairness Accountability Transparency and Ethics in Computer Vision (FATECV-2019) at Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR-2019). 4. Butler, R. N. (1963). The life review: An interpretation of reminiscence in the aged. Psychiatry, 26, 65–76. 5. Cannito, L., Di Crosta, A., Palumbo, R., Ceccato, I., Anzani, S., La Malva, P., Palumbo, R., & Di Domenico, A. (2020). Health anxiety and attentional bias toward virus-related stimuli during the COVID-19 pandemic. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 16476.
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|