Abstract
AbstractThe spreading of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods in different and critical application domains, like medicine and healthcare, introduces many opportunities but raises risks and opens ethical issues, mainly attaining to the lack of transparency. This contribution deals with the lack of transparency of ML and DL models focusing on the lack of trust in predictions and decisions generated. In this sense, this paper establishes a measure, namely Congruity, to provide information about the reliability of ML/DL model results. Congruity is defined by the lattice extracted through the formal concept analysis built on the training data. It measures how much the incoming data items are close to the ones used at the training stage of the ML and DL models. The general idea is that the reliability of trained model results is highly correlated with the similarity of input data and the training set. The objective of the paper is to demonstrate the correlation between the Congruity and the well-known Accuracy of the whole ML/DL model. Experimental results reveal that the value of correlation between Congruity and Accuracy of ML model is greater than 80% by varying ML models.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Salerno
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Software
Reference35 articles.
1. Commission E (2020) White paper on artificial intelligence-a European approach to excellence and trust. Com 65 Final (2020)
2. Andrade NNGd, Kontschieder V (2021) Ai impact assessment: A policy prototyping experiment. Available at SSRN 3772500
3. Goebel R, Chander A, Holzinger K, Lecue F, Akata Z, Stumpf S, Kieseberg P, Holzinger A (2018) Explainable AI: the new 42? In: International cross-domain conference for machine learning and knowledge extraction, pp 295–303. Springer
4. Gunning D, Aha D (2019) Darpa’s explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) program. AI Mag 40(2):44–58
5. Doran D, Schulz S, Besold TR (2017) What does explainable AI really mean? A new conceptualization of perspectives. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.00794
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献