Abstract
AbstractA significant correlation between the in-plane (IP) and out-of-plane (OOP) damage propagation of masonry infills (MIs) is frequently observed after strong earthquakes, posing a serious problem as regards vulnerability of public buildings such as schools. The present work is aimed at identifying the effects of different IP and OOP modelling assumptions of MIs on their seismic damage. To this end, the state secondary school De Gasperi-Battaglia in Norcia (Italy), object of monitoring by the Department of Civil Protection since 2000, is investigated for the heterogeneity of infill typologies. The school is composed of a basement and three storeys above ground level, with a reinforced concrete (r.c.) framed structure having a long-shaped rectangular plan. Two typologies can be identified in terms of transverse layout of MIs: (i) double-leaf interior partitions, made of hollow clay bricks; (ii) double-leaf exterior infill walls, constituted by facade solid bricks paired with hollow clay bricks. In addition, partial height infills in the longitudinal direction, due to classroom windows, make the columns susceptible to short column effects. MIs are represented by a five-element macro-model predicting both in-plane (IP) and out-of-plane (OOP) behaviour through a horizontal nonlinear truss and four diagonal nonlinear beam elements, respectively. Stiffness and strength values in the OOP direction are also reduced considering the evolution of the IP damage. Three assumptions are investigated for the behaviour of structural MIs: i.e. elastic both IP and OOP; inelastic IP and elastic OOP; inelastic both IP and OOP. Bare and infilled test structures are subjected to biaxial spectrum-compatible accelerograms, to evaluate the IP and OOP damage levels and effectiveness of the OOP simplified verification proposed by seismic codes.
Funder
Università della Calabria
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geophysics,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference51 articles.
1. Acunzo G, Pagliaroli A, Scasserra G. (2014) In-Spector: un software di supporto alla selezione di accelerogrammi naturali spettrocompatibili per analisi geotecniche e strutturali. 33° Convegno Nazionale GNGTS, Bologna, Italy 2: 107–114
2. Asteris PG, Cavaleri L, Di Trapani F, Tsaris AK (2017) Numerical modelling of out-of-plane response of infilled frames: state of the art and future challenges for the equivalent strut macromodels. Eng Struct 132:110–122
3. Basha SH, Kaushik HB (2018) A novel macromodel for prediction of shear failure in columns of masonry infilled RC frames under earthquake loading. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-00537-5
4. Bertoldi SH, Decanini LD, Gavarini C. (1993) Telai tamponati soggetti ad azione sismica, un modello semplificato: confronto sperimentale e numerico. Proceedings of the VI National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, ANIDIS, Perugia, Italy
5. Braga F, Manfredi V, Masi A, Salvatori A, Vona M (2011) Performance of non-structural elements in RC buildings during the L’Aquila, 2009 earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng 9(1):307–324
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献