Author:
Masi Angelo,Lagomarsino Sergio,Dolce Mauro,Manfredi Vincenzo,Ottonelli Daria
Abstract
AbstractWithin the 2019–2021 research agreement between the Civil Protection Department (DPC) and the Network of University Laboratories for Earthquake Engineering (ReLUIS), the work package WP4 “Seismic Risk Maps—MARS” is specifically devoted to update the 2018 release of the Italian National Seismic Risk Assessment. To this end, the previously considered models of hazard, exposure and vulnerability will be critically reviewed and updated by taking advantage also from the results deriving from other WPs of the DPC-ReLUIS research project. In the present paper some of the most relevant aspects that are being introduced in the development of the new Italian risk maps have been described and shortly analysed. First, a significant upgrade of the vulnerability model implemented in the new version of the platform used for risk calculation (IRMA) is proposed, where reference to the six EMS-98 classes is made also considering regional vulnerability features. Further, empirical data from observed real damage are integrated with results from numerical simulations (mechanical approach), in particular for reinforced concrete buildings. Finally, some special construction types such as schools, churches and bridges are included in order to provide a more comprehensive view of the national risk.
Funder
Università degli Studi della Basilicata
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geophysics,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference108 articles.
1. Abrahamson NA (1998) Non-stationary spectral matching program RSPMATCH. Pacific Gas and Electric Company Internal Report
2. Abrahamson NA, Al Atik L (2010) Scenario spectra for design ground motions and risk calculation. Proceedings of the 9th U.S. National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, July 25–29, 2010, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Paper No 1896
3. ASCE (2007) Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings, ASCE/SEI 41–06. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia
4. Baltzopoulos G, Baraschino R, Iervolino I (2019) On the number of records for structural risk estimation in PBEE. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 48:489–506. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3145
5. Baker JW (2011) Conditional mean spectrum: tool for ground motion selection. J Struct Eng 137(3):322–331. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000215
Cited by
65 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献