Abstract
AbstractThe seismic vulnerability of a city is a degree of its intrinsic susceptibility or predisposition to sustain damage or losses stemming from seismic events. In terms of physical vulnerability, one of the most important factors for assessing seismic risk, especially, for estimating losses, is the exposure of structures, particularly those structures intended for residential use. The present article outlines a methodology for classifying residential buildings based on the structural and non-structural components that ultimately determine the building typology and control the seismic performance. The proposed methodology is divided into three steps: first, spatial data are analysed using an official database that is supplemented by remote field work to verify, validate, and identify construction typologies and urban modifiers after incorporating the new observable data. During the second step, machine learning techniques based on Two-Step cluster analysis and neural networks are used to identify building typologies, using a multilayer perceptron to assess the representativeness of the building typologies identified. Finally, each building typology is defined, a vulnerability assessment is carried out, and vulnerability classes are ranked based on the macroseismic scale. The above-mentioned steps were applied to 7631 residential buildings in the city of Murcia, Spain. The methodology is scalable and may be automated, so it may be replicated in other urban areas with similar characteristics or adapted to different urban settings. This may help save time and reduce the cost of carrying out seismic risk studies, providing valuable information for both civil protection and regional and local governments.
Funder
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geophysics,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference60 articles.
1. Angeletti P, Bellina A, Guagenti E, Moretti A, Petrini V (1988) Comparison between vulnerability assessment and damage index, some results. In: Proceedings of the 9th world conference on earthquake engineering. Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, pp 181–186.
2. Ballestar MT, Grau-Carles P, Sainz J (2018) Customer segmentation in e-commerce: applications to the cashback business model. J Bus Res 88:407–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.047
3. Barbat AH, Lantada N, Pujades L, Carreño L, Cardona OD (1998) Evaluación del riesgo sísmico de Barcelona. SÍSMICA 2004—6º Congresso Nacional de Sismologia e Engenharia Sísmica
4. Basaglia A, Aprile A, Spacone E, Pilla F (2018) Performance-based seismic risk assessment of urban systems. Int J Archit Herit 12(7–8):1131–1149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2018.1503371
5. Basset-Salom L, Guardiola-Víllora A (2014) Seismic performance of masonry residential buildings in Lorca’s city centre, after the 11th May 2011 earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng 12:2027–2048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9559-8
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献