Abstract
AbstractSeveral recent studies have investigated the risk posed to structures by earthquake sequences, proposing state-dependent fragility/vulnerability models for assets in damaged conditions. However, a critical component for such efforts, i.e., ground-motion record selection, has received relatively minor consideration. Specifically, utilization of “consistent” mainshock (MS)–aftershock (AS) ground motions is desirable in practical applications. Such consistency in selecting MS–AS sequences requires proper consideration of the correlations between and within the intensity measures of MS and AS ground motions. Most of the studies in this domain utilize spectral accelerations as the considered ground-motion intensity measures and rely on empirical linear correlation models between the intensity measures of MS and AS ground motions for developing, for instance, record selection approaches. This study proposes a generalized ground-motion model (GGMM) to estimate consistent 30 × 1 vectors of intensity measures for mainshocks (denoted as IMMS) and aftershocks (denoted as IMAS) using a framework of successive long-short-term-memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network (RNN). The vectors of IMMS and IMAS consist of geometric means of significant duration ($$D_{5 - 95,geom}$$
D
5
-
95
,
g
e
o
m
), Arias intensity ($$I_{a,geom}$$
I
a
,
g
e
o
m
), cumulative absolute velocity ($$CAV_{geom}$$
C
A
V
geom
), peak ground velocity ($$PGV_{geom}$$
P
G
V
geom
), peak ground acceleration ($$PGA_{geom}$$
P
G
A
geom
) and RotD50 spectral acceleration ($$S_{a} \left( T \right)$$
S
a
T
) at 25 periods for both MS and AS ground motions. The proposed RNN-based GGMM is trained on a carefully selected set of ~ 700 crustal and subduction recorded MS–AS sequences. The inputs to the framework include a 5 × 1 vector of source and site parameters for MS and AS recordings. The residuals of the trained LSTM-based RNN are further used to develop empirical covariance structures for IMMS and IMAS. The proposed framework is finally illustrated to select MS–AS ground motions based on IMMS and IMAS using a multi-criteria objective function. The selected MS–AS ground motion sequences are then used to perform non-linear time-history analyses of a case-study two-spanned symmetric bridge structure. The obtained engineering demand parameters are evaluated and critically discussed.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geophysics,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference45 articles.
1. Aljawhari K, Gentile R, Freddi F, Galasso C (2020) Effects of ground-motion sequences on fragility and vulnerability of case-study reinforced concrete frames. In: Bulletin of earthquake engineering (issue 0123456789). Springer, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-01006-8
2. Ancheta TD, Bozorgnia Y, Darragh R, Silva WJ, Chiou B, Stewart JP, Boore DM, Graves R, Abrahamson NA, Campbell KW, Idriss IM, Youngs RR, Atkinson GM (2004) PEER NGA-West2 database: a database of ground motions recorded in shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions. http://peer.berkeley.edu/peer_ground_motion_database
3. Baker JW, Cornell CA (2006) Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35(9):1077–1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.571
4. Boore DM (2010) Orientation-independent, nongeometric-mean measures of seismic intensity from two horizontal components of motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100(4):1830–1835. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090400
5. Burton HV, Sreekumar S, Sharma M, Sun H (2017) Estimating aftershock collapse vulnerability using mainshock intensity, structural response and physical damage indicators. Struct Saf 68:85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.05.009
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献