Abstract
AbstractMortar-less construction with interlocking bricks has many advantages, such as improved construction efficiency and relatively low requirements on labour skills. Nevertheless, the seismic performance of interlocking brick structures is not well understood yet. In this paper, laboratory tests and numerical modelling are carried out to investigate the seismic behaviour of interlocking brick walls. Laboratory shaking table tests are performed on a scaled reinforced mortar-less interlocking brick wall. The response and damage modes under in-plane seismic loading are investigated. A detailed numerical model is then generated and validated with the laboratory testing data. Unlike the conventional masonry wall that diagonal shear damage governs the failure, the interlocking brick wall exhibits rocking responses, whose damage is mainly at the two bottom corners of the wall. Full-scale interlocking brick walls are then modelled and compared with conventional concrete masonry unit (CMU) walls bonded by mortar. Comparisons are made between the seismic resistances and damage modes of the two walls. The influences of ground motion intensities, vertical components of seismic excitations and different seismic time histories on the seismic behaviour of the interlocking brick wall are examined. It is found that the interlocking brick wall has a higher seismic resistance capacity than the conventional CMU wall. Inter-brick friction is the main energy dissipation mechanism in the interlocking brick wall. Because of the rocking response, vertical component of the ground motion significantly influences the damage of interlocking brick wall. The interlocking brick wall is insensitive to velocity pulses of ground motions due to its relatively high natural frequency.
Funder
Australian Research Council
Curtin University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geophysics,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference94 articles.
1. (2011) CCAA GUIDE HB 71 [T38]: reinforced concrete design handbook in accordance with AS3600–2009, 5th edn. CCAA Technical Publications - All Series. Cement Concrete & Aggregates Australia (CCAA), Sydney, NSW
2. Abdulla KF, Cunningham LS, Gillie M (2017) Simulating masonry wall behaviour using a simplified micro-model approach. Eng Struct 151:349–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.08.021
3. Ahmed A, Afreen A, Moin K (2017) State of art review: behaviour of masonry structures under gravity and seismic loads. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 7:202–214
4. Al-Fakih A, Mohammed BS, Nuruddin F, Nikbakht E (2018) Development of interlocking masonry bricks and its’ structural behaviour: a review paper. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 140:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/140/1/012127
5. Ali M, Chouw N (2013) Experimental investigations on coconut-fibre rope tensile strength and pullout from coconut fibre reinforced concrete. Constr Build Mater 41:681–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.12.052
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献