Abstract
AbstractThe material and structural performance of calcium silicate (CS) brick masonry has received relatively little attention in the past, although this material is often used for the construction of low-rise buildings in Central and Northern Europe. Upon the occurrence of induced seismicity in the north of the Netherlands, an extensive testing programme has been conducted since 2014 at Delft University of Technology. The paper presents the outcomes of eight quasi-static cyclic tests performed within this program on CS brick masonry walls under vertical and lateral in-plane loads. Different dimensions, boundary conditions and applied pre-compression loads were considered. Overall, the tests allowed to characterise the in-plane behaviour of CS brick masonry walls. The results confirmed the influence of the shear ratio (i.e. the ratio between the effective height and the length of the wall) on the wall response in terms of prevailing failure mode, initial stiffness, force and deformation capacity, energy dissipation. Besides, the experimental outcomes stressed the difficulty in estimating the effective stiffness and near collapse drift capacity. Additionally, an empirical equation is proposed to predict the peak lateral force. The equation, calibrated against the tests presented in this paper, was validated against an extended dataset of tests performed on CS masonry walls. The equation, which does not need any input of material parameters and is applicable irrespectively of the expected failure mode, can be used to estimate the force capacity of CS masonry walls when no or limited data on the material properties are available.
Funder
Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geophysics,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference44 articles.
1. Beyer K, Mergos P (2015) Sensitivity of drift capacities of URM walls to cumulative damage demands and implications on loading protocols for quasi-static cyclic tests. In: Proceedings of the 12th North American Masonry conference
2. Bruneau M (2002) Building damage from the Marmara, Turkey earthquake of August 17, 1999. J Seismol 6(3):357–377. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020035425531
3. Ceci AM, Contento A, Fanale L, Galeota D, Gattulli V, Lepidi M, Potenza F (2010) Structural performance of the historic and modern buildings of the University of L’Aquila during the seismic events of April 2009. Eng Struct 32(7):1899–1924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.12.023
4. CEN, European Committee for Standardisation (2005a) Eurocode 6: design of masonry structures—part 1-1: general rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry structures. Design Code EN 1998-3. Brussels, Belgium
5. CEN, European Committee for Standardisation (2005b) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 3: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Design Code EN 1998-3. Brussels, Belgium
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献