Abstract
AbstractQuantitative estimation of seismic risk over a region requires both an underlying probabilistic seismic hazard model and a means to characterise shallow site response over a large scale. The 2020 European Seismic Risk Model (ESRM20) builds on the 2020 European Seismic Hazard Model (ESHM20), requiring additional information to firstly parameterise the local site condition across all of Europe, and subsequently determine its influence on the prediction of seismic ground motion. Initially, a harmonised digital geological database for Europe is compiled, alongside a model of topographic/bathymetric elevation and a database of 30 m averaged shearwave velocity measurements ($$V_{S30}$$
V
S
30
), in order to produce separate 30 arc-second maps of inferred $$V_{S30}$$
V
S
30
based on topography and on geology. We then capitalise on a large database of seismic recording stations in Europe for which site-to-site ground motion residuals ($$\delta S2S_{S}$$
δ
S
2
S
S
) have been determined with respect to the shallow crustal ground motion model used in the ESHM20. These residuals allow us to incorporate site amplification functions into the European GMM calibrated upon either observed or inferred $$V_{S30}$$
V
S
30
, or on the European geology and topography models. We present the resulting pan-European seismic site amplification model and assess its impact on seismic hazard and risk compared against other approaches. The new site amplification model fulfils the requirements of the ESRM20 and, providing uncertainty is fully propagated, yields estimates of seismic hazard and risk at a large space scale that may be comparable to other methods often applied at local/urban scale where better-constrained site information is available.
Funder
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum - GFZ
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geophysics,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference83 articles.
1. Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ, Kamai R (2014) Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions. Earthq Spectra 30(3):1025–1055
2. Abrahamson NA, Gregor N, Addo K (2016) BC hydro ground motion prediction equations for subduction earthquakes. Earthq Spectra 32(1):23–44
3. Abrahamson NA, Gülerce Z (2020) Regionalized ground-motion models for subduction earthquakes based on the NGA-SUB database. Tech. Rep. PEER Report No. 2020/25. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center
4. Ahdi SK, Stewart JP, Ancheta TD, Kwak DY, Mitra D (2017) Development of VS profile database and proxy-based models for VS 30 prediction in the Pacific Northwest region of North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 107(4):1781–1801
5. Akkar S, Sandikkaya A, Bommer JJ (2014a) Empirical ground-motion models for point- and extended-source crustal earthquake scenarios in Europe and the Middle East. Bull Earthq Eng 12:359–387
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献