Abstract
AbstractThe seismic performance and safety of major European industrial facilities have a global interest for the whole of Europe and its citizens. However, the seismic design of these facilities is based on national, sometimes outdated seismic hazard analyses. The results of the commonly developed, fully harmonized newly released European Seismic Hazard Model ESHM20 provide a pertinent reference for seismic hazard at European scale and have been officially adopted as an “acceptable representation of the seismic hazard in Europe” in the ongoing revision of Eurocode 8. This study presents a large-scale investigation of the impact of the potential adoption of ESHM20 on the design of new industrial facilities as well as on the potential seismic risk of existing facilities at European level with respect to the current seismic codes. The horizontal elastic response spectra using ESHM20 in combination with the revised Eurocode 8 for selected industrial sites are compared with the respective response spectra of the national regulations for return periods of 475, 2500 and 5000 years. In addition, a single containment LNG tank is analysed for an industrial site in Germany using the design approach for liquid filled tanks according to the revised Eurocode 8. Furthermore, a deterministic and probabilistic seismic risk assessment of a vessel installed in a five-storey frame is performed for industrial sites in Greece and Germany. The examples show that a consistent procedure all over Europe would be desirable and a benefit for engineers in terms of comparability and achievement of the same safety targets. Based on the conducted illustrative studies, the consequences of a potential adoption of the revised Eurocode 8 and ESHM20 hazard maps are discussed and summarized with respect to the standard harmonisation process in Europe.
Funder
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geophysics,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference49 articles.
1. AFPS (2011) Guide méthodologique pour la conception, l’installation et le diagnostic des équipements en zone sismique, Guide élaboré par l’Association Française du génie ParaSismique dans le cadre du Plan Séisme piloté par le Ministère de l’Ecologie, Version 2–2011
2. Bindi D, Iervolino I, Parolai S (2016) On-site structure-specific real-time risk assessment: perspectives from the REAKT project. Bull Earthq Eng 14:2471–3249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9889-4
3. Boxberger T, Fleming K, Pittore M, Parolai S, Pilz M, Mikulla S (2017) The multi-parameter wireless sensing system (MPwise): its description and application to earthquake risk mitigation. Sensors 17(10):2400. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17102400
4. Butenweg C (2021) Integrated approach for monitoring and management of buildings with digital building models and modern sensor technologies, Civil Engineering 2021—Achievements and Visions, Proceedings of the International Conference celebrating 175th Anniversary of the Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Belgrade, Serbia, Editors: Vladan Kuzmanović, Ivan Ignjatović, October 25–26, Belgrade, Serbia
5. Butenweg C, Bursi O, Paolacci F, Marinkovic M, Lanese I, Nardin C, Quinci G (2020) Seismic performance of an industrial multi-storey frame structure with process equipment subjected to shake table testing, engineering Structures, vol 243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112681
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献