Abstract
Abstract
Objective
Cognitive impairment is now recognized as an impending public health crisis. About one-third of adults are concerned about their cognition, and the prevalence of objective cognitive impairment is much higher among those with neurological disorders. Existing screening tools are narrowly focused on detecting dementia in older adults and must be clinician-administered and scored, making them impractical for many neurology practices. This study examined the utility of a brief, self-administered, computerized cognitive screening tool, the Brief Assessment of Cognitive Health (BACH), in identifying cognitive impairment in adults.
Methods
912 adults (ages 18–84) completed BACH and a neuropsychological battery. Multivariable models were developed to provide a BACH index score reflecting the probability of cognitive impairment for individual patients. Predictive accuracy was compared to that of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in a subset of 160 older adults from a Memory Disorders clinic.
Results
The final multivariable model showed good accuracy in identifying cognitively impaired individuals (c = 0·77). Compared to MoCA, BACH had superior predictive accuracy in identifying older patients with cognitive impairment (c = 0·79 vs. 0·67) as well as differentiating those with MCI or dementia from those without cognitive impairment (c = 0·86 vs. c = 0·67).
Conclusions
Results suggest that cognitive impairment can be identified in adults using a brief, self-administered, automated cognitive screening tool, and BACH provides several advantages over existing screeners: self-administered; automatic scoring; immediate results in health record; easily interpretable score; utility in wide range of patients; and flags for treatable factors that may contribute to cognitive complaints (i.e., depression, sleep problems, and stress).
Funder
Cleveland Clinic Neurological Institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [Internet] Cognitive impairment: A call for action, now! (2011). Cited 2024 May 20. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/aging/pdf/cognitive_impairment/cogimp_poilicy_final.pdf
2. Commissaris CJ, Ponds RW, Jolles J (1998) Subjective forgetfulness in a normal Dutch population: possibilities for health education and other interventions. Patient Educ Couns 34:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00040-8
3. Fritsch T, McClendon MJ, Wallendal MS et al (2014) Prevalence and cognitive bases of subjective memory complaints in older adults: evidence from a community sample. J Neurodegener Dis 2014:176843. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/176843
4. Paradise MB, Glozier NS, Naismith SL et al (2011) Subjective memory complaints, vascular risk factors and psychological distress in the middle-aged: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry 11:108. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-11-108
5. Deary IJ, Corley J, Gow AJ et al (2009) Age-associated cognitive decline. Br Med Bull 92:135–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldp033