Prodromal multiple sclerosis: considerations and future utility
-
Published:2024-02-11
Issue:4
Volume:271
Page:2129-2140
-
ISSN:0340-5354
-
Container-title:Journal of Neurology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Neurol
Author:
Harding Katharine E.ORCID, Kreft Karim L., Ben-Shlomo Yoav, Robertson Neil P.
Abstract
AbstractA multiple sclerosis (MS) prodrome has recently been described and is characterised by increased rates of healthcare utilisation and an excess frequency of fatigue, bladder problems, sensory symptoms and pain, in the years leading up to clinical onset of disease. This important observation may have several potential applications including in the identification of risk factors for disease, the potential to delay or prevent disease onset and early opportunities to alter disease course. It may also offer possibilities for the use of risk stratification algorithms and effective population screening. If standardised, clearly defined and disease specific, an MS prodrome is also likely to have a profound influence on research and clinical trials directed at the earliest stages of disease. In order to achieve these goals, it is essential to consider experience already gleaned from other disorders. More specifically, in some chronic neurological disorders the understanding of disease pro-drome is now well advanced and has been successfully applied. However, understanding of the MS prodrome remains at an early stage with key questions including the length of the prodrome, symptom specificity and potential benefits of early intervention as yet unanswered. In this review we will explore the evidence available to date and suggest future research strategies to address unanswered questions. In addition, whilst current understanding of the MS prodrome is not yet sufficient to justify changes in public health policy or MS management, we will consider the practical utility and future application of the MS prodrome in a wider health care setting.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference54 articles.
1. Marrie RA, Allegretta M, Barcellos LF, Bebo B, Calabresi PA, Correale J, Davis B, De Jager PL, Gasperi C, Greenbaum C, Helme A, Hemmer B, Kanellis P, KostichW LD, Lebrun-Frenay C, Makhani N, Munger KL, Okuda DT, Ontaneda D, Postuma RB, Quandt JA, Roman S, Saidha S, Sormani MP, Strum J, Valentine P, Walton C, Zackowski KM, Zhao Y, Tremlett H (2022) From the prodromal stage of multiple sclerosis to disease prevention. Nat Rev Neurol 18:559–572. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-022-00686-x 2. Berg D, Postuma RB, Adler CH, Bloem BR, Chan P, Dubois B, Gasser T, Goetz CG, Halliday G, Joseph L, Lang AE, Liepelt-Scarfone I, Litvan I, Marek K, Obeso J, Oertel W, Olanow CW, Poewe W, Stern M, Deuschl G (2015) MDS research criteria for prodromal Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 30:1600–1611. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.26431 3. Masters CL, Bateman R, Blennow K, Rowe CC, Sperling RA, Cummings JL (2015) Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers 1:15056. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.56 4. Vermunt L, Sikkes SAM, van den Hout A, Handels R, Bos I, van der Flier WM, Kern S, Ousset PJ, Maruff P, Skoog I, Verhey FRJ, Freund-Levi Y, Tsolaki M, Wallin AK, Olde Rikkert M, Soininen H, Spiru L, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Scheltens P, Muniz-Terrera G, Visser PJ (2019) Duration of preclinical, prodromal, and dementia stages of Alzheimer’s disease in relation to age, sex, and APOE genotype. Alzheimer’s Dementia 15:888–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2019.04.001 5. Jiang F, Cheng C, Huang J, Chen Q, Le W (2022) Mild behavioral impairment: an early sign and predictor of Alzheimer’s disease dementia. Curr Alzheimer Res 19:407–419. https://doi.org/10.2174/1567205019666220805114528
|
|