Large diameter hemicraniectomy does not improve long-term outcome in malignant infarction
-
Published:2023-05-10
Issue:8
Volume:270
Page:4080-4089
-
ISSN:0340-5354
-
Container-title:Journal of Neurology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Neurol
Author:
Lehrieder DominikORCID, Müller Hans-Peter, Kassubek Jan, Hecht Nils, Thomalla Götz, Michalski Dominik, Gattringer Thomas, Wartenberg Katja E., Schultze-Amberger Jörg, Huttner Hagen, Kuramatsu Joji B., Wunderlich Silke, Steiner Hans-Herbert, Weissenborn Karin, Heck Suzette, Günther Albrecht, Schneider Hauke, Poli Sven, Dohmen Christian, Woitzik Johannes, Jüttler Eric, Neugebauer Hermann,
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
In malignant cerebral infarction decompressive hemicraniectomy has demonstrated beneficial effects, but the optimum size of hemicraniectomy is still a matter of debate. Some surgeons prefer a large-sized hemicraniectomy with a diameter of more than 14 cm (HC > 14). We investigated whether this approach is associated with reduced mortality and an improved long-term functional outcome compared to a standard hemicraniectomy with a diameter of less than 14 cm (HC ≤ 14).
Methods
Patients from the DESTINY (DEcompressive Surgery for the Treatment of malignant INfarction of the middle cerebral arterY) registry who received hemicraniectomy were dichotomized according to the hemicraniectomy diameter (HC ≤ 14 cm vs. HC > 14 cm). The primary outcome was modified Rankin scale (mRS) score ≤ 4 after 12 months. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, mRS ≤ 3 and mortality after 12 months, and the rate of hemicraniectomy-related complications. The diameter of the hemicraniectomy was examined as an independent predictor of functional outcome in multivariable analyses.
Results
Among 130 patients (32.3% female, mean (SD) age 55 (11) years), the mean hemicraniectomy diameter was 13.6 cm. 42 patients (32.3%) had HC > 14. There were no significant differences in the primary outcome and mortality by size of hemicraniectomy. Rate of complications did not differ (HC ≤ 14 27.6% vs. HC > 14 36.6%, p = 0.302). Age and infarct volume but not hemicraniectomy diameter were associated with outcome in multivariable analyses.
Conclusion
In this post-hoc analysis, large hemicraniectomy was not associated with an improved outcome or lower mortality in unselected patients with malignant middle cerebral artery infarction. Randomized trials should further examine whether individual patients could benefit from a large-sized hemicraniectomy.
Clinical trial registration information
German Clinical Trials Register (URL: https://www.drks.de; Unique Identifier: DRKS00000624).
Funder
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Neurology (clinical),Neurology
Reference29 articles.
1. Chung J, Bang OY, Lim YC, Park SK, Shin YS (2011) Newly suggested surgical method of decompressive craniectomy for patients with middle cerebral artery infarction. Neurologist 17:11–15 2. Curry WT Jr, Sethi MK, Ogilvy CS, Carter BS (2005) Factors associated with outcome after hemicraniectomy for large middle cerebral artery territory infarction. Neurosurgery 56:681–692 3. Güresir E, Vatter H, Schuss P, Oszvald A, Raabe A, Seifert V, Beck J (2011) Rapid closure technique in decompressive craniectomy. J Neurosurg 114:954–960 4. Hacke W, Schwab S, Horn M, Spranger M, De Georgia M, von Kummer R (1996) “Malignant” middle cerebral artery territory infarction: clinical course and prognostic signs. Arch Neurol 53:309–315 5. Hecht N, Neugebauer H, Fiss I, Pinczolits A, Vajkoczy P, Juttler E, Woitzik J (2018) Infarct volume predicts outcome after decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant hemispheric stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 38:1096–1103
|
|