Abstract
AbstractRecent studies have found correlations between the shape of snake teeth/fangs and diet. These studies were done at a very broad phylogenetic scale, making it desirable to test if correlations are still detectable at a narrower evolutionary scale, specifically within the family Elapidae. To this end, we studied fang shape in a dense selection of elapids representing most genera worldwide (74%). We used three-dimensional geometric morphometrics to analyse fang diversity and evaluate possible correlations between fang shape, fang size, and diet. We detected weak phylogenetic signal for both shape and absolute fang size, and found that evolutionary allometry contributes a small proportion of the among-species variation. The distribution of elapid fangs in morphospace was found to be surprisingly conservative, with only a few outliers. The only three dietary categories that were found to have a significant effect on fang shape are mammals, lizards, and reptile eggs, with mammals having a significant effect also on absolute but not relative fang size. Our results show that there are disparate patterns in fang-diet relationships at different evolutionary scales. Across all venomous snakes, previous work found that fangs are strongly influenced by diet, but within elapids our study shows these same associations are weaker and often non-significant. This could result from limitations in these types of studies, or could reflect the fact that elapids are a relatively young clade, where recent extensive divergences in diet have yet to be mirrored in fang shape, suggesting a lag between changes in ecology and dental morphology.
Funder
Australian Research Council
The University of Adelaide
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference51 articles.
1. Adams, D. C. (2014a). A generalized K statistic for estimating phylogenetic signal from shape and other high-dimensional multivariate data. Systematic Biology, 63, 685–697. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syu030.
2. Adams, D. C. (2014b). A method for assessing phylogenetic least squares models for shape and other high-dimensional multivariate data. Evolution, 68, 2675–2688. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12463.
3. Adams, D. C., Collyer, M. L., Kaliontzopoulou, A., & Baken, E. K. (2021). Geomorph: Software for geometric morphometric analyses. R package version 4.0. https://cran.r-project.org/package=geomorph.
4. Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T. Jr., & Ives, A. R. (2003). Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: Behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution, 57, 717–745. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.x
5. Broeckhoven, C., & du Plessis, A. (2017). Has snake fang evolution lost its bite? New insights from a structural mechanics viewpoint. Biology Letters, 13, 20170293. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2017.0293.