Abstract
AbstractClimate change has been increasing the frequency and severity of drought periods. There is a need to understand how this water scarcity affects aquatic communities. The main aim of this work was to compare the macroinvertebrate communities and their bioindicator value (ecological status sensu the Water Framework Directive) in three Regions [northeast (N), central (C) and south (S)] of Portugal along a water availability and climate gradient, in two consecutive years that reflect hydrologically distinct scenarios (2018 versus 2019). The period prior to sampling (summer and autumn 2017) was extremely dry and hot, whereas climatic fluctuations in 2018–2019 (when the sampling occurred) were closer to the norm. A total of 28 sampling sites were surveyed in streams of Regions where water scarcity is differentially constitutive. The results showed a consistent environmental and ecological gradient in both years, despite the background differences. A coinciding mineralization, temperature, riparian cover and water availability gradient clearly separated Regions C (wettest) and S (driest), with Region N occupying an intermediate position. Region C had overall higher ecological quality (prevalence of sensitive organisms) in both years. Despite our a priori expectations that 2018 would represent a much more stressful condition, with larger differences across Regions (because of their constitutive background), the data suggest that macroinvertebrate communities may be resilient or adapted, to some degree, to hydrological fluctuations. Signs of more favourable conditions in 2019 were also observed (general improvement in ecological status). Studies across hydrological and climatic gradients (in time and space) are particularly important where water availability is becoming more challenging.
Funder
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Universidade de Aveiro
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Water Science and Technology,Ecology,Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference71 articles.
1. Alba-Tercedor J, Sánchez-Ortega A (1988) Un método rápido y simple para evaluar la calidad biológica de las águas corrientes basado en el de Hellawell (1978). Limnética 4:51–56
2. APA (2016) Plano de Gestão de Bacia Hidrográfica, Parte 2—Caracterização e Diagnóstico
3. APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA) and the Water Environment Federation (WEF), Washington DC
4. Arias Font R, Khamis K, Milner AM, Sambrook Smith GH, Ledger ME (2021) Low flow and heatwaves alter ecosystem functioning in a stream mesocosm experiment. Sci Total Environ 777:146067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146067
5. Beck HE, Zimmermann NE, McVicar TR, Vergopolan N, Berg A, Wood EF (2018) Present and future Köppen–Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Sci Data 5:180214. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.214