Abstract
AbstractWe report on the design of a close-to-practice research project situated in Southwest England exploring the relationship between developing teachers’ ‘powerful knowledge’ of inter-religious dialogue in religious education (RE) through a teacher fellowship model for RE specialists, including a specialist curriculum development programme and co-constructed evaluation of an intervention seeking to promote ‘warmer’ community relations. This current phase of the ‘Shared Space’ project combines insight from two existing subject-specific knowledge exchange projects—undertaken by us—with a Teacher Fellowship approach to pedagogical and curriculum knowledge development pioneered by the Historical Association, and an emerging one, ‘After RE’. The current Shared Space project addresses two established concerns in RE that are not normally connected: (1) the lack of rigorous subject knowledge held by RE teachers in England; (2) the assumption that good RE in schools can promote community relations, a widely accepted assumption hitherto without much evidence to support it. Here we set out a justification for the project and the form it will take, based on established Shared Space principles of how best to support in-service teachers’ ongoing professional development through knowledge exchange with academics, mindful of equal power relations. While appreciating aspects of the notion of ‘powerful knowledge’ on which ‘theory-rich’ Teacher Fellowships have been based, we cite thinking from the emerging After RE project to suggest a modified theoretical framework for our investigation which will innovate methodologically when evaluating its impact in partnership with teacher participants.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. Alberts, W. (2007). Integrative religious education in Europe. Walter De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110971347
2. Alberts, W. (2017). Reconstruction, critical accommodation or business as usual? Challenges of criticisms of the world religions paradigm to the design of teaching programmes in the study of religions. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 29(4–5), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341404
3. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
4. Baumfield, V. (2016). Making a difference in the religious education classroom: Integrating theory and practice in teachers’ professional learning. British Journal of Religious Education, 38(2), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2016.1139889
5. Biesta, G., Aldridge, D., Hannam, P., & Whittle, S. (2019). Religious literacy: A way forward for religious education? A report submitted to the Culham St Gabriel’s trust. Retrieved June 28, 2023 from https://www.reonline.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Religious-Literacy-Biesta-Aldridge-Hannam-Whittle-June-2019.pdf