Abstract
AbstractReligious Education has long been part of Zambia’s primary and secondary education curriculum. Though it contains a social justice section, it has been weakly socially transformative. This could be seen to be a major challenge today if Religious Education is to be educational. With a swiftly expanding social situation placing increasing numbers at the margins, it is argued that this frail transformative element in Religious Education results primarily because Religious Education has been assimilated by the main inegalitarian education system, which continues to be misinterpreted as delivering social justice.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference101 articles.
1. A Pastoral Letter: Catholic Bishops. (2009). (Lusaka: Catholic Secretariat).
2. Bailin, S., & Siegel, H., et al. (2003). Critical thinking. In N. Blake (Ed.), The blackwell guide to the philosophy of education. Oxford: Blackwell.
3. Barnes, L. P. (2001). What is wrong with the phenomenological approach to Religious Education? Religious Education, 96(4), 445–461.
4. Barnes, L.P. (2014). Education, religion and diversity: Developing a new model of religious education. London: Routledge).
5. Beirne, C. (1985). Jesuit Education for justice: The Collegio in El Salvador, 1968–1984. Harvard Educational Review, 55, 1–19.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献