Abstract
AbstractThe article relates to different approaches which emphasize a multi-level perspective as well as the institutional conditions that shape adult education. With reference to both the political economy approach and the governance perspective, it is outlined how these more general approaches can be theoretically amended by neo-institutional ideas especially when considering the institutional conditions that shape adult education at an organizational level. Based on a re-analysis of interview data, the findings provide first empirical indications of how institutional conditions of adult education organizations (e.g. the actors involved and their institutionalized relationships of interdependency) can be further specified when neo-institutional ideas are taken into account.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. Altrichter, H. (2010). Theory and Evidence on Governance. Conceptual and Empirical Strategies of Research on Governance in Education. European Educational Research Journal, 9(2), 147–158.
2. Altrichter, H. (2015). Governance – Steuerung und Handlungskoordination bei der Transformation von Bildungssystemen. In H. J. Abs, T. Brüsemeister, M. Schemmann & J. Wissinger (Eds.), Governance im Bildungssystem. Analysen zur Mehrebenenperspektive, Steuerung und Koordination (pp. 21–63). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
3. Altrichter, H., Brüsemeister, T., & Wissinger, J. (Eds.). (2007). Educational governance. Handlungskoordination und Steuerung im Bildungssystem. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
4. Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2007). Über die Rechtfertigung. Eine Soziologie der kritischen Urteilskraft. Hamburg: Hamburger Ed.
5. Desjardins, R. (2017). Political Economy of Adult Learning Systems. Comparative Studies of Strategies, Policies and Constraints. London: Bloomsbury.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献