Author:
Abid Hussain A.,Markesteijn Annabel P.,Karabasov Sergey A.,Jawahar Hasan Kamliya,Azarpeyvand Mahdi
Abstract
AbstractWall-Modelled Large Eddy Simulations (LES) are conducted using a high-resolution CABARET method, accelerated on Graphics Processing Units (GPUs), for a canonical configuration that includes a flat plate within the linear hydrodynamic region of a single-stream jet. This configuration was previously investigated through experiments at the University of Bristol. The simulations investigate jets at acoustic Mach numbers of 0.5 and 0.9, focusing on two types of nozzle geometries: round and chevron nozzles. These nozzles are scaled-down versions (3:1 scale) of NASA’s SMC000 and SMC006 nozzles. The parameters from the LES, including flow and noise solutions, are validated by comparison with experimental data. Notably, the mean flow velocity and turbulence distribution are compared with NASA’s PIV measurements. Additionally, the near-field and far-field pressure spectra are evaluated in comparison with data from the Bristol experiments. For far-field noise predictions, a range of techniques are employed, ranging from the Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings (FW–H) method in both permeable and impermeable control surface formulations, to the trailing edge scattering model by Lyu and Dowling, which is based on the Amiet trailing edge noise theory. The permeable control surface FW–H solution, incorporating all jet mixing and installation noise sources, is within 2 dB of the experimental data across most frequencies and observer angles for all considered jet cases. Moreover, the impermeable control surface FW–H solution, accounting for some quadrupole noise contributions, proves adequate for accurate noise spectra predictions across all frequencies at larger observer angles. The implemented edge-scattering model successfully captures the mechanism of low-frequency sound amplification, dominant at low frequencies and high observer angles. Furthermore, this mechanism is shown to be effectively consistent for both $$M=0.5$$
M
=
0.5
and $$M=0.9$$
M
=
0.9
, and for jets from both round and chevron nozzles.
Funder
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. Abid, H.A., Markesteijn, A.P., Karabasov, S.A.: Trailing edge noise modelling of flow over NACA airfoils informed by LES. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-2233
2. Abid, H.A., Stalnov, O., Karabasov, S.A.: Comparative analysis of low order wall pressure spectrum models for trailing edge noise based in Amiet Theory. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-2231
3. Amiet, R.: Noise due to turbulent flow past a trailing edge. J. Sound Vib. 47(3), 387–393 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(76)90948-2
4. Bridges, J., Brown, C.: Parametric testing of chevrons on single flow hot jets. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-2824
5. Brown, C.: Jet-surface interaction test: Far-field noise results. Technical Memorandum NASA/TM–2015-218089, NASA (2015). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20150006729/downloads/20150006729.pdf