Abstract
AbstractThere is no single solution to cutting emissions, however, renewable energy projects that are backed by rigorous ex-ante assessments play an important role in these efforts. An inspection of literature reveals critical knowledge gaps in the understanding of future wind speed variability across Zambia, thus leading to major uncertainties in the understanding of renewable wind energy potential over the country. Several model performance metrics, both statistical and graphical were used in this study to examine the performance of CORDEX Africa Regional Climate Models (RCMs) in simulating wind speed across Zambia. Results indicate that wind speed is increasing at the rate of 0.006 m s− 1 per year. RCA4-GFDL-ESM2M, RCA4-HadGEM2-ES, RCA4-IPSL-CM5A-MR, and RCA4-CSIRO-MK3.6.0 were found to correctly simulate wind speed increase with varying magnitudes on the Sen’s estimator of slope. All the models sufficiently reproduce the annual cycle of wind speed with a steady increase being observed from April reaching its peak around August/September and beginning to drop in October. Apart from RegCM4-MPI-ESM and RegCM4-HadGEM2, the performance of RCMs in simulating spatial wind speed patterns is generally good although they overestimate it by ~ 1 m s− 1 in the western and southern provinces of the country. Model performance metrics indicate that with a correlation coefficient of 0.5, a root mean square error of 0.4 m s− 1, an RSR value of 7.7 and a bias of 19.9%, RCA4-GFDL-ESM2M outperforms all other models followed by RCA4-HadGEM2, and RCA4-CM5A-MR respectively. These results, therefore, suggest that studies that use an ensemble of RCA4-GFDL-ESM2M, RCA4-HadGEM2, and RCA4-CM5A-MR would yield useful results for informing future renewable wind energy potential in Zambia.
Funder
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computers in Earth Sciences,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference49 articles.
1. Akintande O, Olubusoye O, Adenikinju A, Olanrewaju B (2020) Modeling the determinants of renewable energy consumption: Evidence from the five most populous nations in Africa. Energy 206:117992. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117992
2. Albadi M, El-Saadany E (2009) Wind Turbines Capacity Factor Modeling—A Novel Approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst 24(3):1637–1638. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2009.2023274
3. Antunes Campos R, Rafael do Nascimento L, Rüther R (2020) The complementary nature between wind and photovoltaic generation in Brazil and the role of energy storage in utility-scale hybrid power plants. Energy Conv Manag 221:113160. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113160
4. Banda A, Simukoko L, Mwenda HM (2019) A review of wind resource potential for grid-scale power generation in Zambia. UNESCO 6th Africa Engineering Week and 4th Africa Engineering Conference, on the 18th – 20th September, 2019, at Avani Victoria Falls Resort, Livingstone, Zambia
5. Bauen A (2006) Future energy sources and systems—Acting on climate change and energy security. J Power Sources 157(2):893–901. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.03.034
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献