Abstract
AbstractThe reactions that science triggers on the people it studies, describes, or theorises about, can affect the science itself and its claims to knowledge. This phenomenon, which we call reactivity, has been discussed in many different areas of the social sciences and the philosophy of science, falling under different rubrics such as the Hawthorne effect, self-fulfilling prophecies, the looping effects of human kinds, the performativity of models, observer effects, experimenter effects and experimenter demand effects. In this paper we review state-of-the-art research that falls under the remit of the philosophy of reactivity by considering ontological, epistemic and moral issues that reactivity raises. Along the way, we devote special attention to articles belonging to this journal's Topical Collection entitled “Reactivity in the Human Sciences”.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference64 articles.
1. Adair, J. G. (1984). The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 334–345.
2. Ahmadi, N. (2005). Asylsökande barn med uppgivenhetssymtom: Kunskapsöversigt och kartläggning [Asylum-seeking children with withdrawal symptoms: An overview]. Statens Offentliga Utredningar.
3. Allen, S. R. (2021). Kinds behaving badly: Intentional action and interactive kinds. Synthese, 198(Suppl 12), 2927–2956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1870-0
4. Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words (Vol. 88). Oxford University Press.
5. Bergenholtz, C., & Busch, J. (2016). Self-fulfillment of social science theories: Cooling the fire. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 46(1), 24–43.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献