Abstract
AbstractIn this paper I use data from interviews conducted with coral scientists to examine the socio-ecological dimensions of science, i.e. how science shapes and is shaped by the living world around it. I use two sets of ideas in particular: niche construction and socio-ecological value frameworks. Using these I offer socio-ecological criteria by which coral scientists evaluate the activities of coral science, more specifically which living systems are intended to benefit from coral science as an activity, and the motivations behind this. The overall picture I present is one of coral science as activity primarily aimed at sustaining a diverse set of living systems, including humans, other organisms, species, and ecosystems, and the social practices associated with these. The value relations between scientists and aspects of these processes dictate how they respond to shifts in the socio-ecological context coral science is embedded in, explaining why the activities associated with coral science are changing as reef ecosystems are threatened. The implication is that natural sciences more generally are entangled with a greater number of social and ecological process than is typically considered, and that shifts in the activities undertaken by scientists may be driven by ecological as well as social and epistemic processes.
Funder
Economic and Social Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference121 articles.
1. Aaby, B. H., & Ramsey, G. (2022). Three kinds of Niche Construction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 73(2), 351–372.
2. Anderson, S. C., Elsen, P. R., Hughes, B. B., Tonietto, R. K., Bletz, M. C., Gill, D. A., Holgerson, M. A., Kuebbing, S. E., McDonough MacKenzie, C., Meek, M. H., & Veríssimo, D. (2021). Trends in ecology and conservation over eight decades. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 19(5), 274–282.
3. Andow, J. (2016). Qualitative tools and experimental philosophy. Philosophical Psychology, 29(8), 1128–1141.
4. Ankeny, R. A., & Leonelli, S. (2016). Repertoires: A post-kuhnian perspective on scientific change and collaborative research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 60, 18–28.
5. Ankeny, R. A., & Leonelli, S. (2019). Chapter 11: Using repertoires to explore changing practices in recent Coral Research. In K. S. Matlin, J. Maienschein, & R. A. Ankeny (Eds.), Why Study Biology by the Sea? (pp. 249–270). University of Chicago Press.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献