Author:
Del Santo Flavio,Gisin Nicolas
Abstract
AbstractWe propose an interpretation of physics named potentiality realism. This view, which can be applied to classical as well as to quantum physics, regards potentialities (i.e. intrinsic, objective propensities for individual events to obtain) as elements of reality, thereby complementing the actual properties taken by physical variables. This allows one to naturally reconcile realism and fundamental indeterminism in any theoretical framework. We discuss our specific interpretation of propensities, that require them to depart from being probabilities at the formal level, though allowing for statistics and the law of large numbers. This view helps reconcile classical and quantum physics by showing that most of the conceptual problems that are customarily taken to be unique issues of the latter -- such as the measurement problem -- are actually in common to all indeterministic physical theories.
Funder
National Centres of Competence in Research SwissMAP
Austrian Science Fund
University of Geneva
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference46 articles.
1. Ballentine, L. E. (2016). Propensity, probability, and quantum theory. Foundations of physics, 46(8), 973–1005.
2. Barnes, E., & Williams, J. R. (2011). A Theory of Metaphysical Indeterminacy. In K. Karen Bennett & D. Zimmerman (Eds.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics. (Vol. 6). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Berkovitz, J. (2015). The propensity interpretation of probability: A re-evaluation. Erkenntnis, 80(3), 629–711.
4. Butterfield, J. (1992). Probabilities and conditionals: Distinctions by example. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Vol. 92, pp. 251–272). Ney York: Wiley.
5. Butterfield, J. (2005). Determinism and indeterminism. Routledge Enciclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献