Abstract
Abstract
Models provide scientists with knowledge about target systems. An important group of models are those that are called general. However, what exactly is meant by generality in this context is somewhat unclear. The aim of this paper is to draw out a distinction between two notions of generality that has implications for scientific practice. Some models are general in the sense that they apply to many systems in the world and have many particular targets. Another sense is captured by models that are aimed at understanding the fundamental or underlying dynamics of a phenomenon, as opposed to how it manifests in each particular case. They have non-specific, i.e. generic targets. While both notions of generality and genericness are legitimate and correspond to different aspects of scientific practice, they must be distinguished. Failing to do so obscures the danger of overgeneralisation faced by general models and facilitates the illegitimate use of generic models as general models. This can lead to a reduction of the explanatory and predictive power of both.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference77 articles.
1. Aydinonat, N. E. (2005). An interview with Thomas C. Schelling: Interpretation of game theory and the checkerboard model. Economics Bulletin, 2(2), 1–7.
2. Aydinonat, N. E. (2007). Models, conjectures and exploration: An analysis of Schelling’s checkerboard model of residential segregation. Journal of Economic Methodology, 14(4), 429–454.
3. Barlow, J. (1992). Nonlinear and Logistic Growth In Experimental Populations of Guppies. Ecology, 73(3), 941. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940170
4. Batterman, R. W., & Rice, C. C. (2014). Minimal model explanations. Philosophy of Science, 81(3), 349–376.
5. Beckage, B., Gross, L. J., & Kauffman, S. (2011). The limits to prediction in ecological systems. Ecosphere, 2(11), art125. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES11-00211.1
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献