Abstract
AbstractAccording to naturalized metaphysics, metaphysics should be informed by our current best science and not rely on a priori reasoning. Consequently, naturalized metaphysics tends to dismiss metaphysicians’ attempts to quarrel with science. This paper argues that naturalized metaphysics should instead welcome such conflicts between metaphysics and science. Naturalized metaphysics is not (and should not be) eliminative of metaphysics. So, if such conflicts are driven by the immediate absence in science of an answer to a metaphysical question, then the conflict should not be dismissed, but instead be received as an occasion to do (more) naturalized metaphysics. That conflicts between metaphysics and science might be beneficial for naturalized metaphysics is exemplified by the case of non-spatial theories of quantum gravity. These theories are criticized by metaphysicians who, often following David Lewis, argue that spatial distance is an indispensable fundamental element in any coherent metaphysics due to its role as the world-making relation. The resulting conflict, however, is found to be well-motivated since the non-spatial theories of quantum gravity offer no alternative world-making relation to spatial distance. Rather than dismissing this conflict, naturalized metaphysics should therefore receive the Lewisians’ resistance as a call to search for one. How this plays out as a negotiation between the scientific theory and the metaphysical question is exemplified in the last part of the paper where entanglement is proposed as an alternative world-making relation in loop quantum gravity.
Funder
NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference76 articles.
1. Allori, V. (2015). Primitive ontology in a nutshell. International Journal of Quantum Foundations, 1(2), 107–122.
2. Andersen, F., & Becker Arenhart, J. R. (2016). Metaphysics within Science: Against radical naturalism. Metaphilosophy, 47(2), 159–180.
3. Anderson, E. (2012). Problem of time in quantum gravity. Annalen Der Physik, 524(12), 757–786. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.201200147
4. Baron, S. (2019). The curious case of spacetime emergence. Philosophical Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01306-z
5. Baytaş, Bekir, Bianchi, Eugenio, & Yokomizo, Nelson. (2018). Gluing Polyhedra with entanglement in loop quantum gravity. Physical Review D, 98(2), 026001.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献