Abstract
AbstractThe epistemic value of models has traditionally been approached from a representational perspective. This paper argues that the artifactual approach evades the problem of accounting for representation and better accommodates the modal dimension of modeling. From an artifactual perspective, models are viewed as erotetic vehicles constrained by their construction and available representational tools. The modal dimension of modeling is approached through two case studies. The first portrays mathematical modeling in economics, while the other discusses the modeling practice of synthetic biology, which exploits and combines models in various modes and media. Neither model intends to represent any actual target system. Rather, they are constructed to study possible mechanisms through the construction of a model system with built-in dependencies.
Funder
European Research Council
University of Vienna
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference67 articles.
1. Bell-Pedersen, D. V., Cassone, D. J., Earnest, et al. (2005). Circadian rhythms from multiple oscillators: lessons from diverse organisms. Nature Reviews Genetics, 6, 544–556.
2. Boumans, M. (1999). Built-in justification. In Models as mediators. Perspectives on natural and social science, eds. Mary S. Morgan and Margaret, 66–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Brainard, W. C., & Tobin, J. (1968). Pitfalls in financial model building. American Economic Review, 58, 99–122.
4. Bueno, O., & Colyvan, M. (2011). An inferential conception of the application of Mathematics. Nous, 45, 345–374.
5. Bueno, O., & French, S. (2011). How theories represent. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62, 857–894.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献