Abstract
AbstractUntil recently Jeffrey Bub and Itamar Pitowsky, in the framework of an information-theoretic view of quantum mechanics, claimed first that to the measurement problem in its ordinary formulation there correspond in effect two measurement problems (simply called the big and the small measurement problems), with a different degree of relevance and, second, that the analysis of a quantum measurement is a problem only if other assumptions – taken by Pitowsky and Bub to be unnecessary ‘dogmas’ – are assumed. Here I critically discuss this unconventional stance on the measurement problem and argue that the Bub-Pitowsky arguments are inconclusive, mainly because they rely on an unwarranted extension to the quantum realm of a distinction concerning the foundations of special relativity which is in itself rather controversial.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Trento
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference48 articles.
1. Acuna, P. (2014). On the empirical equivalence between special relativity and Lorentz’s ether theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 46, 283–302.
2. Acuna, P. (2016). Minkowski spacetime and Lorentz invariance: The cart and the horse or two sides of a single coin? Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 55, 1–12.
3. Allori, V. (2020). Why scientific realists should reject the second dogma of quantum mechanics. In M. Hemmo & O. Shenker (Eds.), Quantum, probability, logic (pp. 19–48). Springer Nature.
4. Bacciagaluppi, G. (2020). The role of decoherence in quantum mechanics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/qm-decoherence/. Accessed 12 Dec 2021.
5. Bassi, A., Ghirardi, G. (2020). Collapse theories. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. . Accessed 12 December 2021.