Abstract
AbstractWhat is the role of the imagination in scientific practice? Here I focus on the nature and role of invitations to imagine in certain scientific texts as represented by the example of Einstein’s Special Relativity paper from 1905. Drawing on related discussions in aesthetics, I argue, on the one hand, that this role cannot be simply subsumed under ‘supposition’ but that, on the other, concerns about the impact of genre and symbolism can be dealt with, and hence present no obstacle to regarding imagination as appropriately belief-like. By applying the framework of ‘semi- propositional representations’ and ‘quasi-truth’ to this case I thereby offer a new unitary framework for understanding the epistemology of scientific imagination.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference58 articles.
1. Arcangeli, M. (2010). Imagination in Thought Experimentation. Sketching a Cognitive Approach to Thought Experiments. In L. Magnani, W. Carnielli, & C. Pizzi (Eds.), Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology (pp. 571–587). Dordrecht: Springer.
2. Arcangeli, M. (2017). “Response to Only Imagine”, https://junkyardofthemind.com/blog/2017/10/12/symposium-on-only-imagine-commentary-and-response. Accessed 12 May 2020.
3. Arcangeli, M. (2018). Supposition and the Imaginative Realm: A Philosophical Inquiry. London: Routledge.
4. Arcangeli, M., & Dokic, J. (2020). A Plea for the Sublime in Science. In M. Ivanova & S. French (Eds.), The Aesthetics of Science: Beauty, Imagination and Understanding (pp. 104–124). London: Routledge.
5. Baker, A. (2009). Mathematical Explanation in Science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60, 611–633.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献