Abstract
AbstractOne of the most plausible and widely discussed examples of strong emergence is molecular structure. The only detailed account of it, which has been very influential, is due to Robin Hendry and is formulated in terms of downward causation. This paper explains Hendry’s account of the strong emergence of molecular structure and argues that it is coherent only if one assumes a diachronic reflexive notion of downward causation. However, in the context of this notion of downward causation, the strong emergence of molecular structure faces three challenges that have not been met and which have so far remained unnoticed. First, the putative empirical evidence presented for the strong emergence of molecular structure equally undermines supervenience, which is one of the main tenets of strong emergence. Secondly, it is ambiguous how the assumption of determinate nuclear positions is invoked for the support of strong emergence, as the role of this assumption in Hendry’s argument can be interpreted in more than one way. Lastly, there are understandings of causation which render the postulation of a downward causal relation between a molecule’s structure and its quantum mechanical entities, untenable.
Funder
European Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference42 articles.
1. Atkins, P. W. (1974). Quanta: A handbook of concepts. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
2. Batterman, R. W. (2011). Emergence, singularities, and symmetry breaking. Foundations of Physics, 41, 1031–1050.
3. Baysan, U., & Wilson, J. (2017). Must strong emergence collapse? Philosophica, 91, 49–104.
4. Bechtel, W. (2017). Explicating top-down causation using networks and dynamics. Philosophy of Science, 84(2), 253–274.
5. Bedau, M. (2002). Downward causation and the autonomy of weak emergence. Principia, 6, 5–50.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献